Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38569685›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Comparing the effectiveness of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) of insoles manufactured from foam box cast versus direct scans on patient-reported outcome measures: a protocol for a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Laura Barr, Jim Richards, Graham J Chapman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05444192 (Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-aided-design Computer-aided-manufacture), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05444192 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-aided-design Computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) Insoles Manufactured From Foam-box Cast vs Direct Scan on Patient Reported Outcome Measures: A Double-blinded, Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRan2022 to 2023Enrolled114ConditionsFoot Injury, Foot Deformity, Foot Sprain, Feet, FlatArmsCAD/CAM insoles
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura BarrOrthotic Department, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Jim RichardsAllied Health Research unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4004-3115
Graham J ChapmanAllied Health Research unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK GChapman2@uclan.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3983-6641
University of Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCustom insoles are a routine treatment for many foot pathologies, and the use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) is well established within clinical practice in the UK. The method of foot shape capture used to produce insoles varies throughout orthotic services. This trial aims to investigate the effectiveness of two common shape-capture techniques on patient-reported outcomes in people who require insoles for a foot or ankle pathology. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This double-blinded randomised controlled trial will involve two intervention groups recruited from a National Health Service orthotic service. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive a pair of custom CAD/CAM insoles, manufactured either from a direct digital scan or a foam box cast of their feet and asked to wear the insoles for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) pain subdomain, recorded at baseline (immediately after receiving the intervention), 4, 8 and 12 weeks post intervention. Secondary outcome measures will include FHSQ foot function and foot health subdomains recorded at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The Orthotic and Prosthetic User Survey Satisfaction with Device will be recorded at 12 weeks. The transit times associated with each arm will be measured as the number of days for each insole to be delivered after foot shape capture. Tertiary outcome measures will include participant recruitment and dropout rates, and intervention adherence measured as the daily usage of the insoles over 12 weeks. The change in FHSQ scores for the subdomains and insole usage will be compared between the groups and time points, and between group differences in time in transit, cost-time analysis and environmental impact will be compared. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Health Research Authority, London Stanmore Research Ethics Committee (22/LO/0579). Study findings will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and webinars. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05444192.

Indexed as

Foot DiseasesState MedicineComputer-Aided DesignFootHumansPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignFoot & ankleMusculoskeletal disordersPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID38569685
PMCPMC10989167
OpenAlexW4393900056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.