Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38569629›Full record

ArticleNeurospine2024

Deep Learning-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Thoracolumbar Fracture Features on Lateral Radiographs.

Woon Tak Yuh, Eun Kyung Khil, Yu Sung Yoon, Burnyoung Kim, Hongjun Yoon, Jihe Lim, Kyoung Yeon Lee, Yeong Seo Yoo, Kyeong Deuk An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurospine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Woon Tak YuhDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
Eun Kyung KhilDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
Yu Sung YoonDepartment of Radiology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Burnyoung KimDEEPNOID Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Hongjun YoonDEEPNOID Inc., Seoul, Korea.
Jihe LimDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
Kyoung Yeon LeeDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
Yeong Seo YooDepartment of Radiology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.
Kyeong Deuk AnDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm for the quantitative measurement of thoracolumbar (TL) fracture features, and to evaluate its efficacy across varying levels of clinical expertise.

methodsUsing the pretrained Mask Region-Based Convolutional Neural Networks model, originally developed for vertebral body segmentation and fracture detection, we fine-tuned the model and added a new module for measuring fracture metrics-compression rate (CR), Cobb angle (CA), Gardner angle (GA), and sagittal index (SI)-from lumbar spine lateral radiographs. These metrics were derived from six-point labeling by 3 radiologists, forming the ground truth (GT). Training utilized 1,000 nonfractured and 318 fractured radiographs, while validations employed 213 internal and 200 external fractured radiographs. The accuracy of the DL algorithm in quantifying fracture features was evaluated against GT using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Additionally, 4 readers with varying expertise levels, including trainees and an attending spine surgeon, performed measurements with and without DL assistance, and their results were compared to GT and the DL model.

resultsThe DL algorithm demonstrated good to excellent agreement with GT for CR, CA, GA, and SI in both internal (0.860, 0.944, 0.932, and 0.779, respectively) and external (0.836, 0.940, 0.916, and 0.815, respectively) validations. DL-assisted measurements significantly improved most measurement values, particularly for trainees.

conclusionThe DL algorithm was validated as an accurate tool for quantifying TL fracture features using radiographs. DL-assisted measurement is expected to expedite the diagnostic process and enhance reliability, particularly benefiting less experienced clinicians.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningRadiographySpinal curvaturesSpinal fracturesSpinal injuries

Identifiers

PMID38569629
PMCPMC10992637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.