Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38568936›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Intestinal microbiome profiles in broiler chickens raised without antibiotics exhibit altered microbiome dynamics relative to conventionally raised chickens.

Seyed Hossien Kairmi, Khaled Abdelaziz, Heidi Spahany, Jake Astill, David Trott, Blake Wang, Alice Wang, John Parkinson, Shayan Sharif

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Seyed Hossien KairmiDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Khaled AbdelazizDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Heidi SpahanyDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Jake AstillDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
David TrottWallenstein Feed & Supply Ltd, Wallenstein, Ontario, Canada.
Blake WangWallenstein Feed & Supply Ltd, Wallenstein, Ontario, Canada.
Alice WangDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
John ParkinsonProgram in Molecular Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9815-1189
Shayan SharifDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3158-012X
University of Guelph · CAClemson University · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to profile and compare the cecal microbial communities in conventionally (CONV) grown and raised without antibiotics (RWA) broiler chickens. Three hundred chickens were collected from five CONV and five RWA chicken farms on days 10, 24, and 35 of age. Microbial genomic DNA was extracted from cecal contents, and the V4-V5 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified and sequenced. Analysis of 16S rRNA sequence data indicated significant differences in the cecal microbial diversity and composition between CONV and RWA chickens on days 10, 24, and 35 days of age. On days 10 and 24, CONV chickens had higher richness and diversity of the cecal microbiome relative to RWA chickens. However, on day 35, this pattern reversed such that RWA chickens had higher richness and diversity of the cecal microbiome than the CONV groups. On days 10 and 24, the microbiomes of both CONV and RWA chickens were dominated by members of the phylum Firmicutes. On day 35, while Firmicutes remained dominant in the RWA chickens, the microbiome of CONV chickens exhibited am abundance of Bacteroidetes. The cecal microbiome of CONV chickens was enriched with the genus Faecalibacterium, Pseudoflavonifractor, unclassified Clostridium_IV, Bacteroides, Alistipes, and Butyricimonas, whereas the cecal microbiome of RWA chickens was enriched with genus Anaerofilum, Butyricicoccu, Clostridium_XlVb and unclassified Lachnospiraceae. Overall, the cecal microbiome richness, diversity, and composition were greatly influenced by the management program applied in these farms. These findings provide a foundation for further research on tailoring feed formulation or developing a consortium to modify the gut microbiome composition of RWA chickens.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacillotaBacteroidetesCecumChickensRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38568936
PMCPMC10990180
OpenAlexW4393900816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.