Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38568892›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Machine learning for differentiating lung squamous cell cancer from adenocarcinoma using Clinical-Metabolic characteristics and 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics.

Yalin Zhang, Huiling Liu, Cheng Chang, Yong Yin, Ruozheng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yalin ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affillated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Affilated Cancer Hospital, Urumuqi, China.ORCID 0009-0000-4551-8397
Huiling LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, China.
Cheng ChangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Third Affillated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Affilated Cancer Hospital, Urumuqi, China.
Yong YinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Ruozheng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affillated Teaching Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Affilated Cancer Hospital, Urumuqi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0524-1212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive differentiation between the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could benefit patients who are unsuitable for invasive diagnostic procedures. Therefore, this study evaluates the predictive performance of a PET/CT-based radiomics model. It aims to distinguish between the histological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, employing four different machine learning techniques. A total of 255 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into the training (n = 177) and validation (n = 78) sets, respectively. Radiomics features were extracted, and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was employed for feature selection. Subsequently, models were constructed using four distinct machine learning techniques, with the top-performing algorithm determined by evaluating metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). The efficacy of the various models was appraised and compared using the DeLong test. A nomogram was developed based on the model with the best predictive efficiency and clinical utility, and it was validated using calibration curves. Results indicated that the logistic regression classifier had better predictive power in the validation cohort of the radiomic model. The combined model (AUC 0.870) exhibited superior predictive power compared to the clinical model (AUC 0.848) and the radiomics model (AUC 0.774). In this study, we discovered that the combined model, refined by the logistic regression classifier, exhibited the most effective performance in classifying the histological subtypes of NSCLC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellLung NeoplasmsEpithelial CellsFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLungMachine LearningPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID38568892
PMCPMC10990193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.