ArticlePloS one2024
Machine learning for differentiating lung squamous cell cancer from adenocarcinoma using Clinical-Metabolic characteristics and 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- PET radiomics for histologic subtype classification of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Integrating central-slice anatomy and MRF-mapped radiomics dynamics for lung adenocarcinoma subtyping.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Radiomics to understand pre-treatment tumor biology for resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- [Application of Explainable Deep Learning in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Pulmonary Space-occupying Lesions and Classifying Pathological Subtypes of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Article
- Research on the Precise Differentiation of Pathological Subtypes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based onCancers · 2025Article
- Integrating deep learning and radiomics in the differentiation of major histological subtypes of invasive non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma using positron emission tomography and computed tomography.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- OKEN: A Supervised Evolutionary Optimizable Dimensionality Reduction Framework for Whole Slide Image Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative survival analysis of stage T1-T2N0M0 lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma using SEER data, and nomogram analysis for early-stage lung squamous cell carcinoma.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- A Holistic Approach to Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based differentiation of lung squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma using clinical-semantic and radiomic features.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Radiomics for differentiating adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in non-small cell lung cancer beyond nodule morphology in chest CT.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- PET radiomics in lung cancer: advances and translational challenges.EJNMMI physics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noninvasive differentiation between the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) subtypes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could benefit patients who are unsuitable for invasive diagnostic procedures. Therefore, this study evaluates the predictive performance of a PET/CT-based radiomics model. It aims to distinguish between the histological subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, employing four different machine learning techniques. A total of 255 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients were retrospectively analyzed and randomly divided into the training (n = 177) and validation (n = 78) sets, respectively. Radiomics features were extracted, and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) method was employed for feature selection. Subsequently, models were constructed using four distinct machine learning techniques, with the top-performing algorithm determined by evaluating metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). The efficacy of the various models was appraised and compared using the DeLong test. A nomogram was developed based on the model with the best predictive efficiency and clinical utility, and it was validated using calibration curves. Results indicated that the logistic regression classifier had better predictive power in the validation cohort of the radiomic model. The combined model (AUC 0.870) exhibited superior predictive power compared to the clinical model (AUC 0.848) and the radiomics model (AUC 0.774). In this study, we discovered that the combined model, refined by the logistic regression classifier, exhibited the most effective performance in classifying the histological subtypes of NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.