Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38568890›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Deep learning workflow to support in-flight processing of digital aerial imagery for wildlife population surveys.

Tsung-Wei Ke, Stella X Yu, Mark D Koneff, David L Fronczak, Luke J Fara, Travis J Harrison, Kyle L Landolt, Enrika J Hlavacek, Brian R Lubinski, Timothy P White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tsung-Wei KeUniversity of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1315-3834
Stella X YuUniversity of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3507-5761
Mark D KoneffDivision of Migratory Bird Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Orono, Maine, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5674-8953
David L FronczakDivision of Migratory Bird Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, United States of America.
Luke J FaraUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, United States Geological Survey, La Crosse, Wisconsin, Minnesota, United States of America.
Travis J HarrisonUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, United States Geological Survey, La Crosse, Wisconsin, Minnesota, United States of America.
Kyle L LandoltUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, United States Geological Survey, La Crosse, Wisconsin, Minnesota, United States of America.
Enrika J HlavacekUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, United States Geological Survey, La Crosse, Wisconsin, Minnesota, United States of America.
Brian R LubinskiDivision of Migratory Bird Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington, Minnesota, United States of America.
Timothy P WhiteEnvironmental Studies Program, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Sterling, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

US Fish and Wildlife Service 140F0918P0139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning shows promise for automating detection and classification of wildlife from digital aerial imagery to support cost-efficient remote sensing solutions for wildlife population monitoring. To support in-flight orthorectification and machine learning processing to detect and classify wildlife from imagery in near real-time, we evaluated deep learning methods that address hardware limitations and the need for processing efficiencies to support the envisioned in-flight workflow. We developed an annotated dataset for a suite of marine birds from high-resolution digital aerial imagery collected over open water environments to train the models. The proposed 3-stage workflow for automated, in-flight data processing includes: 1) image filtering based on the probability of any bird occurrence, 2) bird instance detection, and 3) bird instance classification. For image filtering, we compared the performance of a binary classifier with Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN) as a means of sub-setting large volumes of imagery based on the probability of at least one bird occurrence in an image. On both the validation and test datasets, the binary classifier achieved higher performance than Mask R-CNN for predicting bird occurrence at the image-level. We recommend the binary classifier over Mask R-CNN for workflow first-stage filtering. For bird instance detection, we leveraged Mask R-CNN as our detection framework and proposed an iterative refinement method to bootstrap our predicted detections from loose ground-truth annotations. We also discuss future work to address the taxonomic classification phase of the envisioned workflow.

Indexed as

Animals, WildDeep LearningAnimalsBirdsNeural Networks, ComputerRemote Sensing TechnologyWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID38568890
PMCPMC10990224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.