ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024
Toward Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in AI for Social Media and Health Care: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital and AI-enhanced psychosocial interventions in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a scoping review of reviews.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Advancements in artificial intelligence transforming medical education: a comprehensive overview.Medical education online · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning and artificial intelligence in type 2 diabetes prediction: a comprehensive 33-year bibliometric and literature analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Enhancing Strategic Agility and Real Time Decision-Making in the Technology Sector: Exploring the Role of AI and e-HRM Systems.F1000Research · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and hearing health: a global evidence review of biases and equity implications for Africa.Global health action · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Algorithmic Bias in Burn Care: A Literature Review of Ethical Challenges.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026Review
- Ethical Governance of Large Language Models in Health Care: Trust, Responsibility, and Equity in Routine Use.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Review
- Bridging Traditional Modeling and Artificial Intelligence in Measles Epidemiology: Methods, Applications, and Future Directions-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Recent advances in machine learning-enhanced extracellular vesicle omics for oncology.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Ethical challenges and opportunities for integrating predictive analytics in community-based overdose prevention.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- AI and Digital Tools in Dermatology: Addressing Access and Misinformation.JMIR dermatology · 2026Review
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Comprehensive Review on Diagnostic, Treatment, and Prevention Aspects.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Data fairness-the new social challenge of the data economy: what shapes social media users' perception of data fairness?Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Navigating bibliometric indicators in university rankings: a conceptual framework for strategic research management.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Review
- Generative artificial intelligence and large language models in sports medicine: a scoping review of applications, accuracy, and ethical implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of social media for disseminating health care information has become increasingly prevalent, making the expanding role of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in this process both significant and inevitable. This development raises numerous ethical concerns. This study explored the ethical use of AI and machine learning in the context of health care information on social media platforms (SMPs). It critically examined these technologies from the perspectives of fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE), emphasizing computational and methodological approaches that ensure their responsible application.
objectiveThis study aims to identify, compare, and synthesize existing solutions that address the components of FATE in AI applications in health care on SMPs. Through an in-depth exploration of computational methods, approaches, and evaluation metrics used in various initiatives, we sought to elucidate the current state of the art and identify existing gaps. Furthermore, we assessed the strength of the evidence supporting each identified solution and discussed the implications of our findings for future research and practice. In doing so, we made a unique contribution to the field by highlighting areas that require further exploration and innovation.
methodsOur research methodology involved a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We used strategic searches through specific filters to identify relevant research papers published since 2012 focusing on the intersection and union of different literature sets. The inclusion criteria were centered on studies that primarily addressed FATE in health care discussions on SMPs; those presenting empirical results; and those covering definitions, computational methods, approaches, and evaluation metrics.
resultsOur findings present a nuanced breakdown of the FATE principles, aligning them where applicable with the American Medical Informatics Association ethical guidelines. By dividing these principles into dedicated sections, we detailed specific computational methods and conceptual approaches tailored to enforcing FATE in AI-driven health care on SMPs. This segmentation facilitated a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship among the FATE principles and highlighted the practical challenges encountered in their application. It underscored the pioneering contributions of our study to the discourse on ethical AI in health care on SMPs, emphasizing the complex interplay and the limitations faced in implementing these principles effectively.
conclusionsDespite the existence of diverse approaches and metrics to address FATE issues in AI for health care on SMPs, challenges persist. The application of these approaches often intersects with additional ethical considerations, occasionally leading to conflicts. Our review highlights the lack of a unified, comprehensive solution for fully and effectively integrating FATE principles in this domain. This gap necessitates careful consideration of the ethical trade-offs involved in deploying existing methods and underscores the need for ongoing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.