ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2024
Nationwide epidemiologic survey on incidence of macular dystrophy in Japan.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology of macular dystrophy in Japan (2011-2020): a nationwide population-based study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to estimate the number of patients in Japan who had visited an ophthalmologist for macular dystrophy of various types, including Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), Stargardt disease, occult macular dystrophy (OMD), cone (-rod) dystrophy, X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS), and central areolar choroid dystrophy (CACD). STUDY
designNationwide epidemiologic survey
methodsQuestionnaires were distributed to 965 major facilities, including all the university hospitals in Japan. The aim of the questionnaire was to determine the number of patients with each type of macular dystrophy who had visited an outpatient clinic during the past 5 years (January 2015 to December 2019).
resultsOver 70% of the patients were diagnosed and followed up at university hospitals. The estimated annual number of newly diagnosed cases was as follows: 55.3 for BVMD, 36.7 for Stargardt disease, 35.8 for OMD, 160.6 for cone (-rod) dystrophy, 31.0 for XLRS, 29.8 for CACD, and 174.1 for other types of macular dystrophy. The total number of patients with macular dystrophy diagnosed and followed at major institutions was estimated to be 6651.
conclusionThis was the first nationwide survey of macular dystrophy in Japan and provided an approximate number of affected patients. The diagnosis of macular dystrophy is primarily carried out at facilities with affiliated specialists, such as university hospitals. By examining the incidence of multiple diseases simultaneously, we were able to compare the incidence of each type of macular dystrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.