Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38568369›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2024

Optimising oncology drug expenditure in Ireland.

Ruth Kieran, Maeve Hennessy, Kate Coakley, Hazel O'Sullivan, Tim Cronin, Daire Lynch, Eibhlin Mulroe, Katie Cooke, Dearbhaile Collins, Seamus O'Reilly

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruth KieranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. kieranr@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-3651
Maeve HennessyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2369-3327
Kate CoakleyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-6801
Hazel O'SullivanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-7075
Tim CroninCollege of Medicine & Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7446-6258
Daire LynchCancer Trials Ireland, RCSI House, 121 St Stephen's , Dublin 2, Green, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2580-5701
Eibhlin MulroeCancer Trials Ireland, RCSI House, 121 St Stephen's , Dublin 2, Green, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9301-8132
Katie CookeDepartment of Pharmacy, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Dearbhaile CollinsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5156-0142
Seamus O'ReillyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2887-7336

Funding

Breakthrough Cancer Research 000Health Research Board CTIC-2021-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A combination of improvements in patient survival, increasing treatment duration, and the development of more expensive agents has led to a doubling of per-capita spending on cancer medicines in Ireland (2008-2018). Despite this, access to new drugs is poor in comparison to other EU countries. We examine methods to optimise oncology drug spending to facilitate access to newer anticancer agents. Key targets for spending optimisation (biosimilar use, clinical trials and expanded access programs, waste reduction, avoidance of futile treatment, and altered drug scheduling) were identified through an exploratory analysis. A structured literature search was performed, with a focus on articles relevant to the Irish Healthcare system, supplemented by reports from statutory bodies. At the present time, EMA-approved agents are available once approved by the NCPE. Optimising drug costs occurs through guideline-based practice and biosimilar integration, the latter provides €80 million in cost savings annually. Access to novel therapies can occur via over 50 clinical trials and 28 currently available expanded access programmes. Additional strategies include reversion to weight-based immunotherapy dosing, potentially saving €400,000 per year in our centre alone, vial sharing, and optimisation of treatment schedules. A variety of techniques are being employed by oncologists to optimise costs and increase access to innovation for patients. Use of biosimilars, drug wastage, and prescribing at end of life should be audited as key performance indicators, which may lead to reflective practice on treatment planning. Such measures could further optimise oncology drug expenditure nationally facilitating approval of new agents.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug CostsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsHealth ExpendituresHumansIrelandNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBiosimilarsClinical trialsExpanded access programmesPersonalised therapyPharmacoeconomicsTherapy rationalisation

Identifiers

PMID38568369
PMCPMC11294381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.