Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38568360›Full record

ArticleActa parasitologica2024

Chemical Composition and Acaricidal Activity of Essential Oil of Lavandula dentata L. on Engorged Females of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae).

Cicera Maria de Oliveira Xavier, Eduardo Henrique Amorim Silva, Ivaldo Victor Mota de Siqueira, Lucia Oliveira de Macedo, Vanderson Barbosa Bernardo, Henrique Fonseca Goulart, Antônio Euzébio Goulart Santana, Rafael Antonio Nascimento Ramos, Pedro Gregório Vieira Aquino, Gílcia Aparecida de Carvalho

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta parasitologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Study ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cicera Maria de Oliveira XavierLaboratory of Parasitology, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0827-6198
Eduardo Henrique Amorim SilvaLaboratory of Parasitology, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-7829
Ivaldo Victor Mota de SiqueiraLaboratory of Parasitology, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7078-539X
Lucia Oliveira de MacedoLaboratory of Parasitology, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3655-4414
Vanderson Barbosa BernardoInstitute of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0169-4641
Henrique Fonseca GoulartCenter of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0532-6133
Antônio Euzébio Goulart SantanaCenter of Agrarian Sciences, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-438X
Rafael Antonio Nascimento RamosLaboratory of Parasitology, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0347-9358
Pedro Gregório Vieira AquinoLaboratory of Chemistry, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8826-1683
Gílcia Aparecida de CarvalhoLaboratory of Parasitology, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Pernambuco, Brazil. gilcia.carvalho@ufape.edu.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2197-9759
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus is one the most significant ectoparasite in cattle farming in tropical and subtropical regions, causing problems to livestock health worldwide. The control of this ectoparasite primarily relies on the use of synthetic acaricides. However, the emergence of acaricide resistance has stimulated the search for new control alternatives, including phytocompounds with acaricidal and insecticidal potential. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acaricidal potential of Lavandula dentata essential oil against the engorged females of R. (B.) microplus.

methodsEngorged females were obtained from infested bovines in dairy farms in Pernambuco, Brazil. L. dentata essential oil was extracted, and adult immersion test assays were performed using the following oil concentrations: 0.2%, 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.8%, and 1%.

resultsL. dentata essential oil at a concentration of 1% was lethal to all engorged females, and concentrations of 0.6% and 0.8% caused mortality of 98.6% and 99.1%, respectively. These concentrations disrupted the reproductive capacity of engorged females, reducing oviposition by more than 90% and preventing egg hatching by over 87%.

conclusionThe data revealed that L. dentata essential oil possesses effective pharmacological properties against R. (B.) microplus and could be used for tick control following in vivo evaluation, thus contributing to mitigating the negative impacts of synthetic acaricide use.

Indexed as

AcaricidesLavandulaOils, VolatileRhipicephalusAnimalsBrazilCattleCattle DiseasesFemalePlant OilsTick InfestationsAcaricidesOils, VolatilePlant OilsCattleEctoparasitePlantResistanceTicks

Identifiers

PMID38568360
OpenAlexW4393855396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.