ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
Prediction of preeclampsia using maternal circulating mRNAs in early pregnancy.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell-Based and Cell-Free Non-Invasive Prenatal Analysis of Preeclampsia: An Updated Review of Liquid Biopsy.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a predictive model for preeclampsia: a retrospective cohort study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of outcomes and risk factors for recurrent preeclampsia in a subsequent pregnancy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Mitophagy related diagnostic biomarkers for coronary in-stent restenosis identified using machine learning and bioinformatics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePreeclampsia (PE) is one of the most common and serious complications of pregnancy, and novel methods for the early prediction of PE are needed for clinical application.
methodsIn this study, a circulating cell-free RNA (cfRNA) panel of target genes for PE prediction was designed and validated in a case-control cohort and a nested case-control cohort. The QPCR was applied to quantify the copy number of cfRNA, and the data were normalized as multiples of the median. Ratios of serum placental growth factor (PIGF) and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFLT-1) were also measured, and transabdominal ultrasonography was conducted for subjects in the prospective cohort. Binary logistic regression models for PE prediction were constructed and tested.
resultsOur results revealed that the women with PE showed significant alterations in serum cfRNA profiles from early pregnancy onward and before the onset of PE symptoms. Compared with PIGF/sFLT-1 measurement and ultrasonographic imaging, cfRNA test can detect PE at a very early stage of pregnancy. The predictive model exhibited the best performance at gestation week 32, with a detection rate of 100%. At 12 weeks of gestation, the model still manifested an area under curve (AUC) of 0.9144, and sensitivity of 1.0000. If combined with clinical parameters and ultrasonographic indicators, the model can achieve the highest AUC for PE prediction at early gestation.
conclusionMeasurement of cfRNA can be used to effectively predict PE with high performance, providing an additional method for monitoring PE throughout the course of pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.