Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38568143›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024

How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research.

Margaret Cychosz, Matthew B Winn, Matthew J Goupell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret CychoszDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7523-0503
Matthew B WinnDepartment of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Matthew J GoupellDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2662-3057
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Listening effort in cochlear implant usersR01DC017114 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Matthew Brandon Winn · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
Binaural unmasking of tones and speech in bilateral cochlear implanteesR01DC014948 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GOUPELL, MATTHEW J. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
How children with cochlear implants learn speech from their environmentsF32DC019539 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI CYCHOSZ, MARGARET EMILYN · 2021 to 2022
$137k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC019539NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014948NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017114NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The channel vocoder has become a useful tool to understand the impact of specific forms of auditory degradation-particularly the spectral and temporal degradation that reflect cochlear-implant processing. Vocoders have many parameters that allow researchers to answer questions about cochlear-implant processing in ways that overcome some logistical complications of controlling for factors in individual cochlear implant users. However, there is such a large variety in the implementation of vocoders that the term "vocoder" is not specific enough to describe the signal processing used in these experiments. Misunderstanding vocoder parameters can result in experimental confounds or unexpected stimulus distortions. This paper highlights the signal processing parameters that should be specified when describing vocoder construction. The paper also provides guidance on how to determine vocoder parameters within perception experiments, given the experimenter's goals and research questions, to avoid common signal processing mistakes. Throughout, we will assume that experimenters are interested in vocoders with the specific goal of better understanding cochlear implants.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID38568143
PMCPMC10994674
OpenAlexW4393855000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.