Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38568030›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology progress

Development of a pan-tau multivalent nanobody that binds tau aggregation motifs and recognizes pathological tau aggregates.

Nikki McArthur, Bokyung Kang, Felix G Rivera Moctezuma, Akber T Shaikh, Kathryn Loeffler, Nemil N Bhatt, Madison Kidd, Jennifer M Zupancic, Alec A Desai, Naima Djeddar and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Nanobodies targeting hnRNPA2/B1 and tau.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikki McArthurSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9872-8961
Bokyung KangSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Felix G Rivera MoctezumaGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Akber T ShaikhWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kathryn LoefflerSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nemil N BhattMitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Madison KiddMitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Jennifer M ZupancicDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Alec A DesaiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Naima DjeddarParker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Anton BryksinParker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Peter M TessierDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Rakez KayedMitchell Center for Neurodegenerative Disease, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Levi B WoodGeorge W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ravi S KaneSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-4098
Georgia Institute of Technology · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

CD98hc Brain Shuttles for Delivering Off-the-shelf Neuroprotective Antibodies in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG080016 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Colin Fred Greineder, Peter M Tessier · 2023 to 2026
$3.2M
Design and Evolution of Polyvalent Domain Antibodies Specific for Tau AggregatesRF1AG059723 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KANE, RAVI S., TESSIER, PETER M · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
T32 CTEng (Cellular and Tissue Engineering) Training ProgramT32GM145735 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Edward A. Botchwey, Andres J Garcia · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Structure-guided antibody targeting of pre-selected epitopes in amyloidogenic aggregatesR35GM136300 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TESSIER, PETER M · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
National Science Foundation DGE-2039655NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080016NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG059723NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136300NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145735NIH HHS RF1AG059723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies are characterized by the misfolding and aggregation of the tau protein into oligomeric and fibrillar structures. Antibodies against tau play an increasingly important role in studying these neurodegenerative diseases and the generation of tools to diagnose and treat them. The development of antibodies that recognize tau protein aggregates, however, is hindered by complex immunization and antibody selection strategies and limitations to antigen presentation. Here, we have taken a facile approach to identify single-domain antibodies, or nanobodies, that bind to many forms of tau by screening a synthetic yeast surface display nanobody library against monomeric tau and creating multivalent versions of our lead nanobody, MT3.1, to increase its avidity for tau aggregates. We demonstrate that MT3.1 binds to tau monomer, oligomers, and fibrils, as well as pathogenic tau from a tauopathy mouse model, despite being identified through screens against monomeric tau. Through epitope mapping, we discovered binding epitopes of MT3.1 contain the key motif VQIXXK which drives tau aggregation. We show that our bivalent and tetravalent versions of MT3.1 have greatly improved binding ability to tau oligomers and fibrils compared to monovalent MT3.1. Our results demonstrate the utility of our nanobody screening and multivalent design approach in developing nanobodies that bind amyloidogenic protein aggregates. This approach can be extended to the generation of multivalent nanobodies that target other amyloid proteins and has the potential to advance the research and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Single-Domain Antibodiestau ProteinsAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsEpitope MappingHumansMiceProtein AggregatesTauopathiesProtein AggregatesSingle-Domain Antibodiestau ProteinsaggregateAlzheimer's diseaseamyloidmultivalencynanobodytauyeast surface display

Identifiers

PMID38568030
PMCPMC11447142
OpenAlexW4393854952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.