Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38567877›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Advancing a collective vision for equity-based cocreation through prototyping at an international forum.

Michelle Phoenix, Sandra Moll, Alexa Vrzovski, Le-Tien Bhaskar, Samantha Micsinszki, Emma Bruce, Lulwama Mulalu, Puspita Hossain, Bonnie Freeman, Gillian Mulvale and 1 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Group Poetry and Quilt-Making -Creative Public Involvement Approaches to Contentious Concepts in Frailty Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Trailblazing Person-Centred Care: Lessons From a Hospital Cluster-Wide Retreat to Co-Design Approaches to Person-Centred Care in Singapore.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. How Is Equity-Based Co-Creation Enacted in Health and Social Services? An Evaluation of Four Case Studies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Patient Engagement in Integrated Care: What Matters and Why?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Advancing a collective vision for equity-based cocreation through prototyping at an international forum.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michelle PhoenixSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, CanChild, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6190-3997
Sandra MollSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-0103
Alexa VrzovskiAhousaht First Nation, Ahousat, British Colombia, Canada.
Le-Tien BhaskarHealth Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Health Policy), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9925-4411
Samantha MicsinszkiSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, CanChild, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1357-1158
Emma BruceSchool of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-9363-0547
Lulwama MulaluGlobal Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Puspita HossainHealth Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Health Policy), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4042-9824
Bonnie FreemanSchool of Social Work and Indigenous Studies Department, McMaster University; Algonquin/Mohawk, Member of the Six Nations of the Grand River, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6879-6875
Gillian MulvaleHealth Policy and Management, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0546-6910
CoPro ConsortiumMcMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council 611-2021-0231Strategic Alignment FundStrategic Excellence in Retention and Recruitment Funding from McMaster University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCocreation has the potential to engage people with lived and living experiences in the design and evaluation of health and social services. However, guidance is needed to better include people from equity-deserving groups (EDGs), who are more likely to face barriers to participation, experience ongoing or historical harm, and benefit from accessible methods of engagement.

objectiveThe aim of this international forum (CoPro2022) was to advance a collective vision for equity-based cocreation.

designA participatory process of engagement in experiential colearning and arts-based creative and reflective dialogue. Visual prototypes were created and synthesised to generate a collective vision for inclusive equity-based cocreation. SETTING AND

participantsThe Forum was held at the Gathering Place by the Grand River in Ohsweken, Ontario, Canada. A total of 48 participants attended the forum. They were purposely invited and have intersecting positionalities (21 academic experts, six experience experts, 10 trainees, and 11 members of EDGs) from nine countries (Bangladesh, Botswana, Canada, England, Italy, Norway, Scotland, Singapore, Sweden). COPRO2022 ACTIVITIES: CoPro2022 was an immersive experience hosted on Indigenous land that encouraged continuous participant reflection on their own worldviews and those of others as participants openly discussed the challenges and opportunities with engaging EDGs in cocreation activities. Visual prototypes and descriptions created in small groups were informed by participants' reflections on the panel presentations at the Forum and their own experiences with equity-based cocreation. Following the event, the authorship team inductively coded themes from the prototype descriptions and met to discuss the cross-cutting themes. These informed the design of an illustrated collective vision for Equity Based Co-Creation (EqCC).

resultsSix prototypes were cocreated by each small group to illustrate their vision for EqCC. Within these, four cross-cutting themes were identified: (i) go to where people are, (ii) nurture relationships and creativity, (iii) reflect, replenish and grow, (iv) and promote thriving and transformation. These four themes are captured in the Collective EqCC Vision to guide a new era of inclusive excellence in cocreation activities. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Service users, caregivers, and people with lived experience were involved in leading the design of the CoPro2022 and co-led the event. This included activities at the event such as presenting, facilitating small and large group discussion, leading art-based activities, and reflecting with the team on the lessons learned. People with lived experience were involved in the analysis and knowledge sharing from this event. Several members of the research team (students and researchers) also identified as members of EDGs and were invited to draw from their personal and academic knowledge.

Indexed as

Social WorkStudentsEnglandHumansNorwayOntarioarts‐based researchcaregiver engagementcocreationcodesignequityintegrationpatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID38567877
PMCPMC10989061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.