Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38567265›Full record

ArticleGlobal food security2024

Enabling food system innovation: accelerators for change.

Philip Thornton, Daniel Mason D'Croz, Cody Kugler, Roseline Remans, Heather Zornetzer, Mario Herrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global food security, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip ThorntonDepartment of Global Development, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Daniel Mason D'CrozDepartment of Global Development, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Cody KuglerDepartment of Global Development, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Roseline RemansBioversity International, Heverlee, Belgium.
Heather ZornetzerGlocolearning, Genk, Belgium.
Mario HerreroDepartment of Global Development, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that current food systems are not on a trajectory for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals by the end of the decade. Technological innovation will have a considerable role to play in different parts of the food system; many promising options exist or are in the pipeline, some of which may be highly disruptive to existing value chains. Scaling up the innovations required, at the same time as protecting those who may lose out in the short term, will require a strong enabling environment. Here we apply an existing framework of eight change accelerators to six case studies of historical agricultural innovation. We estimated the degree to which each accelerator had been addressed at some stage in the innovation process, as a measure of the gap between what was needed and what was achieved. For the innovations that are being taken to scale and widely utilized, these accelerator gaps are small. Uptake of other innovations is stalled, and for these we found large gaps for one or more of the eight accelerators. Impactful innovation processes address all eight change accelerators at some point, with different phasing of the accelerators depending on the nature of the technology and on the impact pathway being pursued. This simple framework, when used in combination with narratives of uptake based on theories of change and impact pathways, may provide an effective means of screening future innovation processes to help prioritize and guide investment that can lead to more resilient, sustainable and equitable food systems.

Indexed as

Accelerator gapAdoptionFood systemImpactTechnology

Identifiers

PMID38567265
PMCPMC10983825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.