Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38567162›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2024

A systematic review and meta-analysis of radiotherapy and particle beam therapy for skull base chondrosarcoma: TRP-chondrosarcoma 2024.

Masatoshi Nakamura, Masashi Mizumoto, Takashi Saito, Shosei Shimizu, Yinuo Li, Yoshiko Oshiro, Masako Inaba, Sho Hosaka, Hiroko Fukushima, Ryoko Suzuki and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sinonasal Sarcomas Management: An International Consensus Statement.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masatoshi NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masashi MizumotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takashi SaitoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Shosei ShimizuDepartment of Pediatric Radiation Therapy Center/Pediatric Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hebei Yizhou Cancer Hospital, Zhuozhou, China.
Yinuo LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshiko OshiroDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masako InabaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Sho HosakaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiroko FukushimaDepartment of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Ryoko SuzukiDepartment of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Takashi IizumiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kei NakaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kazushi MaruoDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hideyuki SakuraiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
University of Tsukuba · JPUniversity of Tsukuba Hospital · JPTsukuba Medical Center Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chondrosarcoma is a rare malignant bone tumor. Particle beam therapy (PT) can concentrate doses to targets while reducing adverse events. A meta-analysis based on a literature review was performed to examine the efficacy of PT and photon radiotherapy for skull base chondrosarcoma. Methods: The meta-analysis was conducted using 21 articles published from 1990 to 2022. Results: After PT, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.0-96.2%) and 93.9% (95% CI: 90.6-96.1%), respectively, and the 3- and 5-year local control rates were 95.4% (95% CI: 92.0-97.4%) and 90.1% (95% CI: 76.8-96.0%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed a significant association of PT with a superior 5-year OS rate compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (p < 0.001). In the studies used in the meta-analysis, the major adverse event of grade 2 or higher was temporal lobe necrosis (incidence 1-18%, median 7%). Conclusion: PT for skull base chondrosarcoma had a good outcome and may be a valuable option among radiotherapy modalities. However, high-dose postoperative irradiation of skull base chondrosarcoma can cause adverse events such as temporal lobe necrosis.

Indexed as

chondrosarcomameta-analysisprotonskull basesystematic reviewtemporal lobe necrosisTRP

Identifiers

PMID38567162
PMCPMC10985235
OpenAlexW4392966945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.