ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Clinical and radiomics integrated nomogram for preoperative prediction of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-mediated ultrasound radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of triple-negative breast cancer: research progress and future challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- AI-based neoadjuvant immunotherapy response prediction across pan-cancer: a comprehensive review.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Predict Lymphovascular Invasion of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- An XGBoost Machine Learning Based Model for Predicting Ki-67 Value ≥ 15% in TTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- An Ultrasound-based Machine Learning Model for Predicting Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The present study aimed to develop a radiomics nomogram based on conventional ultrasound (CUS) to preoperatively distinguish high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and low TILs in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Methods: In the present study, 145 TNBC patients were retrospectively included. Pathological evaluation of TILs in the hematoxylin and eosin sections was set as the gold standard. The patients were randomly allocated into training dataset and validation dataset with a ratio of 7:3. Clinical features (age and CUS features) and radiomics features were collected. Then, the Rad-score model was constructed after the radiomics feature selection. The clinical features model and clinical features plus Rad-score (Clin+RS) model were built using logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, the performance of the models was evaluated by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: Univariate analysis and LASSO regression were employed to identify a subset of 25 radiomics features from a pool of 837 radiomics features, followed by the calculation of Rad-score. The Clin+RS integrated model, which combined posterior echo and Rad-score, demonstrated better predictive performance compared to both the Rad-score model and clinical model, achieving AUC values of 0.848 in the training dataset and 0.847 in the validation dataset. Conclusion: The Clin+RS integrated model, incorporating posterior echo and Rad-score, demonstrated an acceptable preoperative evaluation of the TIL level. The Clin+RS integrated nomogram holds tremendous potential for preoperative individualized prediction of the TIL level in TNBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.