Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38567091›Full record

ArticleClinical liver disease

Acceptability of hepatitis C screening and treatment during pregnancy in pregnant women in Egypt, Pakistan, and Ukraine: A cross-sectional survey.

Karen Scott, Elizabeth Chappell, Aya Mostafa, Alla Volokha, Nida Najmi, Fatma Ebeid, Svitlana Posokhova, Raheel Sikandar, Marta Vasylyev, Saima Zulfiqar and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical liver disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Gaps in the Hepatitis C Prenatal and Postpartum Care Cascade: Rationale for Treatment in Pregnancy.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Karen ScottMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Elizabeth ChappellMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Aya MostafaDepartment of Community, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Alla VolokhaDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Pediatric Immunology, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Nida NajmiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fatma EbeidDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University and Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Ain Shams University Research Institute-Clinical Research Centre (MASRI-CRC), Cairo, Egypt.
Svitlana PosokhovaOdesa National Medical University, Odesa, Ukraine.
Raheel SikandarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan.
Marta VasylyevAstar Medical Center, Lviv, Ukraine.
Saima ZulfiqarSheikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Viacheslav KaminskyiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Pediatric Immunology, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Sarah PettMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Ruslan MalyutaPerinatal Prevention of AIDS Initiative, Odesa, Ukraine.
Ruslana KarpusKyiv City Center of Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Yomna AymanDepartment of Community, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine, Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Rania H M AhmedDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Saeed HamidDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Manal H El-SayedDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University and Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Ain Shams University Research Institute-Clinical Research Centre (MASRI-CRC), Cairo, Egypt.
Diana GibbMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Ali JuddMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.
Intira Jeannie CollinsMRC Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCL, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2132-6037
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBAin Shams University · EGShupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine · UAAga Khan University · PKAga Khan University Hospital · PKInstitute of Blood Pathology and Transfusion Medicine of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine · UALiaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences · PKOdessa National Medical University · UAShaikh Zayed Medical College and Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) in women of childbearing age is a major public health concern with ∼15 million women aged 15-49 years living with HCV globally in 2019. Evidence suggests HCV in pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes. This includes ∼6% risk of infants acquiring HCV vertically, and this is the leading cause of HCV in children globally. However, few countries offer routine universal antenatal HCV screening, and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are not approved for pregnant or breastfeeding women although small clinical trials are ongoing. We conducted a survey of pregnant and postpartum women in 3 high HCV burden lower-middle-income countries to assess the acceptability of universal antenatal HCV screening and DAA treatment in the scenario that DAAs are approved for use in pregnancy. Pregnant and postpartum women attending antenatal clinics in Egypt, Pakistan, and Ukraine were invited to complete a survey and provide demographic and clinical data on their HCV status. Among the 630 women included (n=210 per country), 73% were pregnant and 27% postpartum, 27% were ever HCV antibody or PCR positive. Overall, 586 (93%) reported acceptability of universal antenatal HCV screening and 544 (88%) would take DAAs in pregnancy (92%, 98%, and 73% in Egypt, Pakistan, and Ukraine, respectively). Most said they would take DAAs in pregnancy to prevent vertical acquisition and other risks for the baby, and a smaller proportion would take DAAs for maternal cure. Our findings suggest that should DAAs be approved for use in pregnancy, the uptake of both HCV screening and DAA treatment may be high in women living in lower-middle-income countries.

Identifiers

PMID38567091
PMCPMC10986914
OpenAlexW4393408726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.