Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38567050›Full record

ArticleOBM geriatrics2023

Screening and Treating Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care: A Missed Opportunity.

Ushma J Patel, Madeline K Moureau, Joan M Neuner, Heidi W Brown

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OBM geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05664451 (Improving Nonsurgical Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Among Women in Primary Care in Wisconsin), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05664451 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Improving Nonsurgical Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Among Women in Primary Care in Wisconsin: Bridging Community-based Continence Promotion and Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2022 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsUI-Assist, Partnership Building
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ushma J PatelUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1010 Mound Street 4th floor, Madison, WI, USA.
Madeline K MoureauUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1010 Mound Street 4th floor, Madison, WI, USA.
Joan M NeunerMedical College of Wisconsin, Division of General Internal Medicine, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Heidi W BrownKaiser Permanente, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3250 Fordham Street, San Diego, CA, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USKaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS U18 HS028738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 60% of adult women in the United States have urinary incontinence (UI), with the prevalence increasing to over 80% in women over age 65. Despite its high prevalence, most patients do not seek care and few clinicians screen for UI. The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey queries patients about satisfaction with their provider's discussion and management of UI, but formal recommendations about screening, diagnosis, and treatment are lacking. This review presents a practical algorithm for primary care providers to incorporate management of UI into routine preventive care for women, and outlines UI prevalence, risk factors, screening, and non-surgical treatment options.

Indexed as

algorithmfemalefunctional incontinencemixed incontinenceprimary carescreeningstress incontinencetreatmenturge incontinenceurinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID38567050
PMCPMC10986360
OpenAlexW4387369319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.