ArticleSAGE open medicine2024
Elevated uric acid in gestational diabetes and its risk on pregnancy outcomes.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal hyperuricemia and adverse maternal-fetal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Association between serum uric acid and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Assessment of Serum Uric Acid Levels Among Gestational Diabetes Patients in Erbil City.Cureus · 2025Article
- Association of hyperuricemia with higher miscarriage rates and lower live birth rates in women undergoing IVF/ICSI.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Serum creatinine, uric acid, and D-dimer levels as predictors of disease severity in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the past few years, gestational diabetes mellitus has become more common. According to earlier research, gestational diabetes mellitus is linked to higher uric acid levels, and gestational hyperuricemia is linked to poor maternal and neonatal outcomes. Aim and objectives: To assess the influence of elevated uric acid >5 mg/dl on pregnancy outcomes such as neonatal weight, respiratory distress, preterm delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, premature membrane rupture, oligohydramnios, cesarean section, and intensive care admission for mothers. Setting and methods: It is a prospective cohort study, carried out at obstetric/family medicine outpatient clinics, Cairo University Hospitals on 221 pregnant females with gestational diabetes mellitus in their third trimester of pregnancy, selected by random sampling, performed structured interviews, and tested for serum uric acid level and were separated into two groups, those with elevated uric acid >5 mg/dl (121) and those without elevated uric acid ⩽5 mg/dl (100) patients and then followed up until delivery in Cairo University Hospitals for collecting pregnancy outcome data. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the antepartum uric acid and neonatal complications, maternal complications, preterm, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, premature rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios, and cesarean section between both groups. Conclusions: This study showed that elevated serum uric acid >5 mg/dl can predict the incidence of maternal and neonatal problems in gestational diabetes mellitus including preterm, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, premature rupture of membranes, oligohydramnios, and cesarean section.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.