Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566889›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2024

Hymenopteran parasitoids reared from European gall midges (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae).

Hans Henrik Bruun, Simon Haarder, Peter Neerup Buhl, Richard R Askew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Untangling host specialization in a "double dark taxa" system.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hans Henrik BruunUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-2577
Simon Haarderprivate researcher, Vordingborg, Denmark private researcher Vordingborg Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5981-738X
Peter Neerup Buhlprivate researcher, Sakskøbing, Denmark private researcher Sakskøbing Denmark.
Richard R Askewprivate researcher, St Marcel du Perigord, France private researcher St Marcel du Perigord France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3860-3697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the results of investigations 2010 through 2023 of hymenopteran parasitoids associated with gall midges in Europe. A total of 242 collections of gall midges were made, from each of which one to several parasitoid species emerged, resulting in ca. 200 recorded parasitoid species and 267 host-parasitoid interaction records. The parasitoid families involved were Eulophidae (63 species), Platygastridae (56 species), Torymidae (34 species), Pteromalidae (31 species), Ceraphronidae (5 species), Eupelmidae (4 species), Eurytomidae (2 species) and Encyrtidae (1 species). As many as 159 interactions are reported for the first time, significantly enlarging our knowledge of gall midge - parasitoid interactions on the species level. Even more interesting, 51 host records are for parasitoid species for which no host was previously known. Similarly, 28 species of gall midge are reported as host to named parasitoids for the first time. Additionally, 91 parasitoid records were the first for the country in question. Differences between the rearing methods applied and their suitability for recording species with contrasting life histories, are discussed.

Indexed as

CecidomyiidaeCeraphronidaeEltonian shortfallEncyrtidaeEulophidaeEupelmidaeEurytomidaehost-parasitoid interactionsPlatygastridaePteromalidaerearing methodsTorymidae

Identifiers

PMID38566889
PMCPMC10985403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.