ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Prediction of tissue outcome in acute ischemic stroke based on single-phase CT angiography at admission.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A multimodal multitask deep learning model for predicting stroke lesion and functional outcomes using 4D CTP imaging and clinical metadata.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automatic prediction of stroke treatment outcomes: latest advances and perspectives.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In acute ischemic stroke, prediction of the tissue outcome after reperfusion can be used to identify patients that might benefit from mechanical thrombectomy (MT). The aim of this work was to develop a deep learning model that can predict the follow-up infarct location and extent exclusively based on acute single-phase computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets. In comparison to CT perfusion (CTP), CTA imaging is more widely available, less prone to artifacts, and the established standard of care in acute stroke imaging protocols. Furthermore, recent RCTs have shown that also patients with large established infarctions benefit from MT, which might not have been selected for MT based on CTP core/penumbra mismatch analysis. Methods: All patients with acute large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation treated at our institution between 12/2015 and 12/2020 were screened ( Results: The mean ± standard deviation test set DSC over all folds after post-processing was 0.35 ± 0.2 and the mean test set average volume error was 11.5 mL. The performance was relatively uniform across models with the best model according to the DSC achieved a score of 0.37 ± 0.2 after post-processing and the best model in terms of average volume error yielded 3.9 mL. Conclusion: 24 h follow-up infarct prediction using acute CTA imaging exclusively is feasible with DSC measures comparable to results of CTP-based algorithms reported in other studies. The proposed method might pave the way to a wider acceptance, feasibility, and applicability of follow-up infarct prediction based on artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.