ArticleGastroenterology report2024
Testing region selection and prognostic analysis of
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- DeepSeek-R1 vs. OpenAI o1 in colorectal cancer screening: a binational evaluation.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Synchronous triple cancers of synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma complicated by renal cancer: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Recent advances on gene-related DNA methylation in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment: a clinical perspective.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
- Prognostic and Immunologic Significance of SH2B2 in Colon Adenocarcinoma and its Relationship to Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2025Article
- Advancements in the clinical application of gene methylation for early cancer detection.Frontiers in epigenetics and epigenomics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: A total of 580 CRC cases were included. The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression was assessed by using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The methylation status of the Regions A, B, C, D, and E in the Results: In 580 CRC cases, the specificities of the methylation test in Regions D and E were both 97.8%. In the MLH1-deficient CRCs, the frequencies of Conclusions: Regions D and E in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.