ArticleCureus2024
High-Fidelity, Indigenously Prepared, Low-Cost Moulage as a Valid Simulation Tool to Improve Trauma Education.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moulage safety practice around the world: a framework for best practice.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Improving pressure injury assessment skills of nursing students' using in-situ simulation and moulage: a randomized controlled trial.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Simulation-based trauma education facilitates repeated practice in a controlled and safer environment for the learner without any risk to the patient's well-being. Moulage contributes to the perception of reality during training using standardized patients. However, the high cost of commercial moulage items is often prohibitive for regular use. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of indigenously prepared, low-cost moulage as a valid simulation tool to improve trauma education, explore possible replacements of commercial moulage products, and determine their merits and demerits. Methodology Readily available economic items were used to make low-cost moulage on the simulated patients to replicate trauma victims. A cross-sectional design used a pre-validated Modified Moulage Authenticity Rating Scale to collect data from 61 participants of Advanced Trauma Life Support and Advanced Trauma Care for Nurses courses to analyze the effectiveness and fidelity of moulage. Results In total, 54 (89%) participants scored the low-cost moulage to provide high fidelity effectively. The majority of respondents graded the authenticity of moulage as good. Overall, 46 (75%) participants felt moulage injuries were quite realistic. All agreed that the moulage-based simulation offered a good teaching-learning alternative to assess and manage trauma victims. Further, 45 (73%) participants felt they were in an actual clinical situation, and 58 (95%) stated it could help them in their clinical practice. Conclusions Indigenously prepared, low-cost moulage is a feasible and cost-effective means to enhance fidelity in simulation-based trauma education. It can also be a possible replacement for commercial moulage. Further research is needed to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of indigenously prepared, cost-effective moulage in trauma education to enhance patient care outcomes. This technique can also be easily translated into other simulation-based medical education domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.