Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566775›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024

Alternative community-led intervention to improve uptake of cataract surgery services in rural Tanzania-The Dodoma Community Cataract Acceptance Trial (DoCCAT): a protocol for intervention co-designing and implementation in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Frank Sandi, Gareth Mercer, Robert Geneau, Kenneth Bassett, Deogratius Bintabara, Albino Kalolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Frank SandiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of Dodoma Medical School, Dodoma, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2073-2041
Gareth MercerDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Robert GeneauDivision of Ophthalmology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Kenneth BassettDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Deogratius BintabaraDepartment of Community Medicine, The University of Dodoma Medical School, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Albino KaloloDepartment of Public Health, St Francis University College of Health and Allied Sciences, Morogoro, Tanzania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-2949
The University of Dodoma · TZUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related lens opacification (cataract) remains the leading cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide. In low- and middle-income countries, utilization of cataract surgical services is often limited despite community-based outreach programmes. Community-led research, whereby researchers and community members collaboratively co-design intervention is an approach that ensures the interventions are locally relevant and that their implementation is feasible and socially accepted in the targeted contexts. Community-led interventions have the potential to increase cataract surgery uptake if done appropriately. In this study, once the intervention is co-designed it will be implemented through a cluster-randomized controlled trial (cRCT) with ward as a unit of randomization. This study will utilise both the qualitative methods for co-designing the intervention and the quantitative methods for effective assessment of the developed community-led intervention through a cRCT in 80 rural wards of Dodoma region, Tanzania (40 Intervention). The 'intervention package' will be developed through participatory community meetings and ongoing evaluation and modification of the intervention based on its impact on service utilization. Leask's four stages of intervention co-creation will guide the development within Rifkin's CHOICE framework. The primary outcomes are two: the number of patients attending eye disease screening camps, and the number of patients accepting cataract surgery. NVivo version 12 will be used for qualitative data analysis and Stata version 12 for quantitative data. Independent and paired t-tests will be performed to make comparisons between and within groups. P-values less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Indexed as

cataract surgeryCommunity-led InterventioncRCTRural TanzaniaUptake Cataract services

Identifiers

PMID38566775
PMCPMC10987207
OpenAlexW4392581938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.