Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566623›Full record

ArticleJournal of nonverbal behavior2024

Mining Bodily Cues to Deception.

Ronald Poppe, Sophie van der Zee, Paul J Taylor, Ross J Anderson, Remco C Veltkamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nonverbal behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ronald PoppeInformation and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0843-7878
Sophie van der ZeeApplied Economics, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3457-5916
Paul J TaylorPsychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8743-7667
Ross J AndersonComputer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8697-5682
Remco C VeltkampInformation and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1934-7170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant body of research has investigated potential correlates of deception and bodily behavior. The vast majority of these studies consider discrete, subjectively coded bodily movements such as specific hand or head gestures. Such studies fail to consider quantitative aspects of body movement such as the precise movement direction, magnitude and timing. In this paper, we employ an innovative data mining approach to systematically study bodily correlates of deception. We re-analyze motion capture data from a previously published deception study, and experiment with different data coding options. We report how deception detection rates are affected by variables such as body part, the coding of the pose and movement, the length of the observation, and the amount of measurement noise. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of a data mining approach, with detection rates above 65%, significantly outperforming human judgement (52.80%). Owing to the systematic analysis, our analyses allow for an understanding of the importance of various coding factor. Moreover, we can reconcile seemingly discrepant findings in previous research. Our approach highlights the merits of data-driven research to support the validation and development of deception theory.

Indexed as

Body motionData miningDeceptionMotion captureMovement analysis

Identifiers

PMID38566623
PMCPMC10982095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.