Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566608›Full record

ReviewMedical education online2024

Twelve tips for addressing ethical concerns in the implementation of artificial intelligence in medical education.

Russell Franco D'Souza, Mary Mathew, Vedprakash Mishra, Krishna Mohan Surapaneni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical education online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Medical education and artificial intelligence: perspectives and ethical challenges].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hematology-Oncology Fellows' Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Multicenter Educational Practice and Needs Assessment Survey.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Global Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dental Education: A Bibliometric Analysis.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Reflection: AI as a catalyst for change in postgraduate medical education.Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Russell Franco D'SouzaDepartment of Education, UNESCO Chair in Bioethics, Melbourne, Australia.
Mary MathewDepartment of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE), Manipal, India.
Vedprakash MishraSchool of Hogher Education and Research, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Nagpur, India.
Krishna Mohan SurapaneniDepartment of Biochemistry, Panimalar Medical College Hospital & Research Institute, Chennai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5204-5708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds immense potential for revolutionizing medical education and healthcare. Despite its proven benefits, the full integration of AI faces hurdles, with ethical concerns standing out as a key obstacle. Thus, educators should be equipped to address the ethical issues that arise and ensure the seamless integration and sustainability of AI-based interventions. This article presents twelve essential tips for addressing the major ethical concerns in the use of AI in medical education. These include emphasizing transparency, addressing bias, validating content, prioritizing data protection, obtaining informed consent, fostering collaboration, training educators, empowering students, regularly monitoring, establishing accountability, adhering to standard guidelines, and forming an ethics committee to address the issues that arise in the implementation of AI. By adhering to these tips, medical educators and other stakeholders can foster a responsible and ethical integration of AI in medical education, ensuring its long-term success and positive impact.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEducation, MedicalHumansSocial ResponsibilityStudentsArtificial intelligenceethical concernsethicsmedical educationmedical educators

Identifiers

PMID38566608
PMCPMC10993743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.