Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566446›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2024

Effects of high-intensity interval training on depressive and anxiety symptoms in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Jhonatan Wélington Pereira Gaia, Felipe Barreto Schuch, Rodrigo Weyll Ferreira, Edielen de Lima Souza, Verônica Moreira Souto Ferreira, Daniel Alvarez Pires

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jhonatan Wélington Pereira GaiaGraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-5542
Felipe Barreto SchuchDepartment of Sports Methods and Techniques, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-4515
Rodrigo Weyll FerreiraGraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-1781
Edielen de Lima SouzaGraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5578-6659
Verônica Moreira Souto FerreiraGraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5120
Daniel Alvarez PiresGraduate Program in Human Movement Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Castanhal, Pará, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-5606
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

This study was partly financed by the Federal University of Pará (UFPA/PROPESP/PAPQ)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although evidence regarding the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on mental health has increased in recent years, there is still no consensus regarding the effects of HIIT on the symptoms of depression and anxiety in a healthy population. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to investigate the effects of HIIT on depressive and/or anxiety symptoms in healthy individuals. The following four databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and PsycINFO. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis based on standardized mean difference (SMD). The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated based on recommendations GRADE. Eight RCTs evaluating 471 participants (81% female) were considered eligible for inclusion. The results of the meta-analysis showed that HIIT-based interventions had no significant effect on reducing anxiety (SMD = -0.17; 95% CI: -0.53, 0.19; p = 0.27) and depressive symptoms (SMD = -0.38; 95% CI: -1.06, 0.30; p = 0.17) compared with the passive control group. In conclusion, HIIT does not improve symptoms of depression and anxiety in healthy individuals. This finding is based on evidence of very low certainty. Therefore, the evidence is still not consistent enough to support HIIT as a viable strategy to reduce both outcomes because of the limited number of included studies and the overall quality of evidence.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicdepressionexercisemental disordersmental healthphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID38566446
PMCPMC12810444
OpenAlexW4393866053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.