ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2024
[Hologram quantitative structure-activity relationship on the gas chromatographic retention index of plant essential oil constituents].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gas chromatography retention index (RI) is an important parameter for the identification of different types of compounds in the field of chromatographic analysis; however, the experimental collection of RI values is a extremely cumbersome process. Thus, there is an urgent need for the establishment of a simple, efficient, and accurate model for the prediction of the RI values of compounds. In this study, first, the experimental RI values for 60 plant essential oil constituents were obtained. Next, a model describing the hologram quantitative structure-activity relationship (HQSAR) between the structural properties of the essential oil constituents and their RI values was investigated and constructed. The optimal HQSAR model was established by setting the model parameters "fragment size", "fragment distinction", "hologram length" and "principal components" to "1-4", "C, Ch", "199", and "4", respectively. Finally, the predictive ability of the model was verified using external test set validation and leave-one-out cross-validation (LOO-CV). The experimental results were as follows, the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP), predictive determination coefficient ([Formula: see text]), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and mean relative error (MRE) for external test set validation were 40.45, 0.984, 0.968, and 2.20%, respectively. Meanwhile, the root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV) and MRE for LOO-CV were 72.56 and 4.17%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that the established HQSAR model has a good predictive ability and can accurately predict the RI values of plant essential oil constituents. In addition, the molecular contribution maps of the HQSAR model revealed that the RI values of aromatic compounds increase when hydroxyl groups are connected to their alkyl chains. Aliphatic compounds feature long chain alkyl groups, which can lead to an increase in RI values. The above phenomena highlight the promising application prospects of HQSAR for studying the RI values of plant essential oil constituents. Therefore, this study provides a reliable theoretical basis for predicting the RI values of other essential oil constituents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.