Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566372›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation.

Bartosz Kłobuszewski, Maciej Szmygin, Karolina Nieoczym, Olga Kłobuszewska, Sławomir Woźniak, Krzysztof Konrad Pyra

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bartosz KłobuszewskiDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Maciej SzmyginDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3177-1572
Karolina NieoczymStudent Scientific Society at the Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-2508-4941
Olga KłobuszewskaDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Sławomir WoźniakDepartment of Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9967-1944
Krzysztof Konrad PyraDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1314-6028
Medical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but potentially dangerous condition that occurs when an embryo implants and develops within the scar tissue from a previous cesarean section. Treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy depends on several factors, including the gestational age of the pregnancy, the presence of complications, and the individual patient's circumstances. We performed a systematic review of the published literature on management of cesarean scar pregnancy and the outcomes, complications, and effects on fertility. A systematic review of recent scientific literature published up to April 2023 in the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We used the search keywords "cesarean scar pregnancy," "methotrexate," "systemic," "chemoembolization," and "uterine artery embolization." The baseline search resulted in 413 articles. After the exclusion of 342 irrelevant articles, the abstracts and titles of the remaining 71 articles were read for potential inclusion, resulting in exclusion of a further 16 articles. Therefore, the full texts of 55 articles were investigated. Finally, 42 papers were included in the study. The main finding was that chemoembolization is more successful than systemic methotrexate therapy, and is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Transarterial chemoembolization appears to be safe and effective method of treatment in patients with CSP and should thus be considered during multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionCicatrixFertility PreservationMethotrexatePregnancy, EctopicUterine Artery EmbolizationChemoembolization, TherapeuticFemaleHumansPregnancyTreatment OutcomeMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID38566372
PMCPMC11000526
OpenAlexW4392382457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.