Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566367›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Divergence in Cigarette Discontinuation Rates by Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS): Longitudinal Findings From the United States PATH Study Waves 1-6.

Karin A Kasza, Zhiqun Tang, Young Sik Seo, Adam F Benson, MeLisa R Creamer, Kathryn C Edwards, Colm Everard, Joanne T Chang, Yu-Ching Cheng, Babita Das and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Authors' Response to "Are Fourth Generation E-cigarettes Reducing Disease in the Population?"Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Karin A KaszaDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-098X
Zhiqun TangBehavioral Health and Health Policy, Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.
Young Sik SeoDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Adam F BensonCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8111-5464
MeLisa R CreamerNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kathryn C EdwardsBehavioral Health and Health Policy, Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0645-1705
Colm EverardNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joanne T ChangCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3974-8089
Yu-Ching ChengCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Babita DasCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Olusola OniyideCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Nicole A TashakkoriCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Anna-Sophie WeidnerCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Haijun XiaoCenter for Tobacco Products, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Cassandra StantonBehavioral Health and Health Policy, Westat, Rockville, MD, USA.
Heather L KimmelNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8278-0095
Wilson ComptonNational Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-5118
Andrew HylandDepartment of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

Center for Tobacco ProductsNIDA NIH HHSNIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe compare real-world trends in population-level cigarette discontinuation rates among adults (ages ≥21) who smoked cigarettes, by electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use. AIMS AND

methodsU.S nationally representative data from adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study (2013/14-2021, Waves 1-6) who smoked cigarettes in the past 30 days (P30D) were analyzed (n = 13 640). The exposure was P30D ENDS use. The outcome was P30D cigarette discontinuation at biennial follow-up. Weighted trend analyses were conducted to test for differences in cigarette discontinuation trends by ENDS use.

resultsBetween 2013/14 and 2015/16, cigarette discontinuation rates were both 16% for those who used ENDS and for those who did not; between 2018/19 and 2021, rates were ~30% for those who used ENDS and ~20% for those who did not; the time by ENDS use interaction was significant.

conclusionsThe relationship between adults' ENDS use and cigarette discontinuation in the context of an expanded ENDS marketplace, new tobacco regulatory actions, and COVID-19 differs from the relationship in earlier years. IMPLICATIONS: It is important for public health decisions to be informed by research based on the contemporary ENDS marketplace and circumstances.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationVapingAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38566367
PMCPMC11750739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.