ArticleGlobal health promotion2024
Decolonial framework for applying reflexivity and positionality in global health research.
Article in Global health promotion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the use of gender-inclusive language amongst health care students and staff in obstetrics and gynaecology.Medical education · 2026Article
- The complexity of inequity: rethinking global health through lived experience, power, and structural vulnerability.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Editorial: More than just skin-deep: considering ethnic, racial, and healthcare disparity-based factors in pain experience, treatment, and guidelines.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Building Bridges: A framework for redefining and decolonizing implementation science in low- and middle-income countries.PLOS global public health · 2026Review
- Complicity or accountability? The limits of positionality statements.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Putting ethics at the centre of health promotion practice: lessons from Australia.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- How to (or how not to)…Enhance equity in the conduct of global health research: dimensions and directions for organizations.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Health justice in fragile and shock-prone settings: from theory to practice towards building resilient health systems.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Missed Nuances in Tuberculosis Research: Reflections from a Tibetan Scholar.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2025Article
- Navigating authoritarian politics: towards reflexive framing in healthcare research.Globalization and health · 2025Article
- 70 years of decoloniality: epistemic disobedience and global public health.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Methodological reflections on identifying and reaching groups left behind from health programs for fieldwork in Kerala, India.Discover public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contemporary research practices link to colonial and imperialist knowledge creation and production and may promote harmful perspectives on marginalized and oppressed groups. We present a framework for a decolonial approach to research in global health and health promotion applicable across research settings. This framework is aimed at anticipating and alleviating potentially harmful practices inherent in dominant research methods. The framework focuses from a macro- and micro-level perspective on three critical dyads: 'context' and 'accountability'; 'researcher identity' and 'positionality'; and 'procedural ethics' and 'ethics in practice' considerations. We present guidance for how to consider reflexivity and positionality as they apply in this framework in global health and health promotion research practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.