Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566243›Full record

ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2024

Delirium screening in the emergency department: evaluation and intervention.

Tehilah Meged-Book, Reut Frenkel, Anna Nikonov, Vladimir Zeldetz, Amit Kosto, Dan Schwarzfuchs, Tamar Freud, Yan Press

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tehilah Meged-BookFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel. tehilah.meged@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2093-5220
Reut FrenkelDepartment of Geriatrics, Soroka Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Anna NikonovDepartment of Pharmacy, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Vladimir ZeldetzFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel.
Amit KostoFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel.
Dan SchwarzfuchsFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel.
Tamar FreudSiaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel.
Yan PressFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer- Sheva, Israel.
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILSoroka Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetween 8-17% of older adults, and up to 40% of those arriving from nursing homes, present with delirium upon admission to the Emergency Department (ED). However, this condition often remains undiagnosed by ED medical staff. We investigated the prevalence of delirium among patients aged 65 and older admitted to the ED and assessed the impact of a prospective study aimed at increasing awareness.

methodsThe study was structured into four phases: a "pre-intervention period" (T0); an "awareness period" (T1), during which information about delirium and its diagnosis was disseminated to ED staff; a "screening period" (T2), in which dedicated evaluators screened ED patients aged 65 and older; and a "post-intervention period" (T3), following the departure of the evaluators. Delirium screening was conducted using the Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM) questionnaire.

resultsDuring the T0 and T1 periods, the rate of delirium diagnosed by ED staff was below 1%. The evaluators identified a delirium rate of 14.9% among the screened older adults during the T2 period, whereas the rate among those assessed by ED staff was between 1.6% and 1.9%. Following the evaluators' departure in the T3 period, the rate of delirium diagnosis decreased to 0.89%.

conclusionsThis study underscores that a significant majority of older adult delirium cases remain undetected by ED staff. Despite efforts to increase awareness, the rate of diagnosis did not significantly improve. While the presence of dedicated delirium evaluators slightly increased the diagnosis rate among patients assessed by ED staff, this rate reverted to pre-intervention levels after the evaluators left. These findings emphasize the necessity of implementing mandatory delirium screening during ED triage and throughout the patient's stay.

Indexed as

DeliriumAgedEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansIsraelProspective StudiesDeliriumEmergency departmentOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID38566243
PMCPMC10985973
OpenAlexW4393396930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.