ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2024
Delirium screening in the emergency department: evaluation and intervention.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors associated with delirium in older emergency department patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Early Diagnosis of Delirium in Geriatric Patients in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Targeted Delirium Screening in At-risk Older Adults in the Emergency Department Improves Screening Rates.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting subsyndromal delirium in critically ill patients in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Delirium Screening in the Emergency Department: Barriers, Enablers and Alignment With Clinical Standards-A Mixed-Methods Study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2026Article
- Pharmacological Management of Delirium in Older Adults in the Emergency Department: Clinical Outcomes.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the anticholinergic burden of medical prescriptions for older patients hospitalized for delirium.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- [Comments on the article "Incidence and factors associated with delirium in an Emergency Department"].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Fidelity of Delirium Screening in the Emergency Department: An Ethnographic Approach.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBetween 8-17% of older adults, and up to 40% of those arriving from nursing homes, present with delirium upon admission to the Emergency Department (ED). However, this condition often remains undiagnosed by ED medical staff. We investigated the prevalence of delirium among patients aged 65 and older admitted to the ED and assessed the impact of a prospective study aimed at increasing awareness.
methodsThe study was structured into four phases: a "pre-intervention period" (T0); an "awareness period" (T1), during which information about delirium and its diagnosis was disseminated to ED staff; a "screening period" (T2), in which dedicated evaluators screened ED patients aged 65 and older; and a "post-intervention period" (T3), following the departure of the evaluators. Delirium screening was conducted using the Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM) questionnaire.
resultsDuring the T0 and T1 periods, the rate of delirium diagnosed by ED staff was below 1%. The evaluators identified a delirium rate of 14.9% among the screened older adults during the T2 period, whereas the rate among those assessed by ED staff was between 1.6% and 1.9%. Following the evaluators' departure in the T3 period, the rate of delirium diagnosis decreased to 0.89%.
conclusionsThis study underscores that a significant majority of older adult delirium cases remain undetected by ED staff. Despite efforts to increase awareness, the rate of diagnosis did not significantly improve. While the presence of dedicated delirium evaluators slightly increased the diagnosis rate among patients assessed by ED staff, this rate reverted to pre-intervention levels after the evaluators left. These findings emphasize the necessity of implementing mandatory delirium screening during ED triage and throughout the patient's stay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.