Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566202›Full record

ArticleChild and adolescent psychiatry and mental health2024

Potential mental health-related harms associated with the universal screening of anxiety and depressive symptoms in Australian secondary schools.

Taylor A Braund, Simon T E Baker, Mirjana Subotic-Kerry, Gabriel Tillman, Nathan J Evans, Andrew Mackinnon, Helen Christensen, Bridianne O'Dea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mood Monitoring in Schools: A Promising Alternative to Single-Time-Point Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The impact of universal mental health screening on stigma in primary schools.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Taylor A BraundBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia. t.braund@blackdog.org.au.
Simon T E BakerOrygen, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mirjana Subotic-KerryBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Gabriel TillmanInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.
Nathan J EvansSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Andrew MackinnonBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Bridianne O'DeaBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUBlack Dog Institute · AUFederation University · AUOrygen · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety and depressive disorders typically emerge in adolescence and can be chronic and disabling if not identified and treated early. School-based universal mental health screening may identify young people in need of mental health support and facilitate access to treatment. However, few studies have assessed the potential harms of this approach. This paper examines some of the potential mental health-related harms associated with the universal screening of anxiety and depression administered in Australian secondary schools.

methodsA total of 1802 adolescent students from 22 secondary schools in New South Wales, Australia, were cluster randomised (at the school level) to receive either an intensive screening procedure (intervention) or a light touch screening procedure (control). Participants in the intensive screening condition received supervised self-report web-based screening questionnaires for anxiety, depression and suicidality with the follow-up care matched to their symptom severity. Participants in the light touch condition received unsupervised web-based screening for anxiety and depression only, followed by generalised advice on help-seeking. No other care was provided in this condition. Study outcomes included the increased risk of anxiety, depression, psychological distress, decreased risk of help-seeking, increased risk of mental health stigma, determined from measures assessed at baseline, 6 weeks post-baseline, and 12 weeks post-baseline. Differences between groups were analysed using mixed effect models.

resultsParticipants in the intensive screening group were not adversely affected when compared to the light touch screening condition across a range of potential harms. Rather, participants in the intensive screening group were found to have a decreased risk of inhibited help-seeking behaviour compared to the light touch screening condition.

conclusionsThe intensive screening procedure did not appear to adversely impact adolescents' mental health relative to the light touch procedure. Future studies should examine other school-based approaches that may be more effective and efficient than universal screening for reducing mental health burden among students. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618001539224) https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375821 .

Indexed as

AdolescentAnxietyDepressionHarmsInterventionSchoolsScreeningStudents

Identifiers

PMID38566202
PMCPMC10985850
OpenAlexW4393431741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.