Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566142›Full record

ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2024

Micro- and nanoplastics concepts for particle and fibre toxicologists.

Stephanie Wright, Flemming R Cassee, Aaron Erdely, Matthew J Campen

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephanie WrightEnvironmental Research Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Flemming R CasseeNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Aaron ErdelyHealth Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, USA.
Matthew J CampenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, 87122, Albuquerque, NM, MSC09 5360, USA. MCampen@salud.unm.edu.
Imperial College London · GBNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

University of New Mexico Center for Metals in Biology and Medicine - equipment supplementP20GM130422 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Sebastian Medina · 2020 to 2026
$20.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130422.NIOSH CDC HHS NIOSH/NORA 9390G1X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro- and nanoplastic particles (MNP) are omnipresent as either pollution or intentionally used in consumer products, released from packaging or even food. There is an exponential increase in the production of plastics. With the realization of bioaccumulation in humans, toxicity research is quickly expanding. There is a rapid increase in the number of papers published on the potential implications of exposure to MNP which necessitates a call for quality criteria to be applied when doing the research. At present, most papers on MNP describe the effects of commercially available polymer (mostly polystyrene) beads that are typically not the MNP of greatest concern. This is not a fault of the research community, necessarily, as the MNPs to which humans are exposed are usually not available in the quantities needed for toxicological research and innovations are needed to supply environmentally-relevant MNP models. In addition, like we have learned from decades of research with particulate matter and engineered nanomaterials, sample physicochemical characteristics and preparation can have major impacts on the biological responses and interpretation of the research findings. Lastly, MNP dosimetry may pose challenges as (1) we are seeing early evidence that plastics are already in the human body at quite high levels that may be difficult to achieve in acute in vitro studies and (2) plastics are already in the diets fed to preclinical models. This commentary highlights the pitfalls and recommendations for particle and fibre toxicologists that should be considered when performing and disseminating the research.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsNanostructuresHumansParticulate MatterPlasticsPolystyrenesMicroplasticsParticulate MatterPlasticsPolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID38566142
PMCPMC10985949
OpenAlexW4393397085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.