Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566111›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Species-aware DNA language models capture regulatory elements and their evolution.

Alexander Karollus, Johannes Hingerl, Dennis Gankin, Martin Grosshauser, Kristian Klemon, Julien Gagneur

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. In silico prediction of variant effects: promises and limitations for precision plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander Karollus *School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-7877
Johannes Hingerl *School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Dennis Gankin *School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Martin GrosshauserSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Kristian KlemonSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Julien GagneurSchool of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany. gagneur@in.tum.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEMunich Center for Machine Learning

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031L0174A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rise of large-scale multi-species genome sequencing projects promises to shed new light on how genomes encode gene regulatory instructions. To this end, new algorithms are needed that can leverage conservation to capture regulatory elements while accounting for their evolution.

resultsHere, we introduce species-aware DNA language models, which we trained on more than 800 species spanning over 500 million years of evolution. Investigating their ability to predict masked nucleotides from context, we show that DNA language models distinguish transcription factor and RNA-binding protein motifs from background non-coding sequence. Owing to their flexibility, DNA language models capture conserved regulatory elements over much further evolutionary distances than sequence alignment would allow. Remarkably, DNA language models reconstruct motif instances bound in vivo better than unbound ones and account for the evolution of motif sequences and their positional constraints, showing that these models capture functional high-order sequence and evolutionary context. We further show that species-aware training yields improved sequence representations for endogenous and MPRA-based gene expression prediction, as well as motif discovery.

conclusionsCollectively, these results demonstrate that species-aware DNA language models are a powerful, flexible, and scalable tool to integrate information from large compendia of highly diverged genomes.

Indexed as

DNARegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAlgorithmsBinding SitesConserved SequenceEvolution, MolecularSequence AlignmentDNA

Identifiers

PMID38566111
PMCPMC10985990
OpenAlexW4393433029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.