Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566049›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Effect of evidence-based nursing practices training programme on the competency of nurses caring for mechanically ventilated patients: a randomised controlled trial.

Sameh Elhabashy, Michiko Moriyama, Eman Ibrahim El-Desoki Mahmoud, Basem Eysa

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05721664 (Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Practices Training Program on the Competency of Nurses Caring for Mechanically Ventilated Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
29.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05721664 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Evidence-based Nursing Practices Training Program on the Competency of Nurses Caring for Mechanically Ventilated Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsNursing Caries, Practice Nurse's Scope, CompetenceArmsTrianing program for nurse in how to provide evidence based practices for mechanically Ventilated Patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sameh ElhabashyFaculty of Nursing, Cairo University, 11562, Cairo, Egypt. Sameh17@cu.edu.eg.
Michiko MoriyamaGraduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 734-8551, Kasumi, Hiroshima, Japan.
Eman Ibrahim El-Desoki MahmoudNational Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
Basem EysaNational Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.
National Water Research Center · EGCairo University · EGHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-Based Practice (EBP) has been recognised worldwide as a standardised approach for enhancing the quality of healthcare and patient outcomes. Nurses play a significant role in integrating EBP, especially in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Consequently, this study aims to examine the effect of an adapted evidence-based nursing practices training programme on the competency level of nurses caring for mechanically ventilated patients.

methodsA prospective open-label parallel 1:1 randomised controlled trial was conducted on 80 nurses caring for ICU patients at the National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Egypt. The trial was carried out between November 2022 and February 2023 under the registration number NCT05721664. The enrolled nurses were randomly divided into intervention and control groups. The intervention group received the evidence-based nursing practice training programme (EBNPTP) in accordance with the Johns Hopkins EBP conceptional model, whereas the control group received traditional in-service education. Four assessments (one pre- and three post-assessments) were conducted to evaluate nurses' competency level over time using the adapted evidence-based nursing competency assessment checklist. The primary endpoint was an increase the competency levels among nurses caring for mechanically ventilated patients.

resultsThe current study results revealed statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups in relation to their level of competency across the three post-assessments, with (p <.001). The study also demonstrated that the nurses' competency level continued to decline significantly over time, with (p <.001). Additionally, a significant correlation was found between the nurses' pre-assessment and educational level, acting as independent variables (predictors), and the third endpoint assessment (p <.01), indicated by multiple linear regression.

conclusionThe EBP training programme demonstrated a significant increase in the nurses' level of competency compared with traditional in-service education. This suggests that by training the nurses in various settings with the essential skills and knowledge for EBP, their competency level can be enhanced, leading to the delivery of effective care and improving patient outcomes. However, the long-term sustainability of the EBP adoptions was insufficient; further studies are needed to investigate the factors that affect the durability of EBP adoption.

trial registrationThe study was registered with Clinical Trials.gov (Registration # NCT05721664) on 10/02/2023.

Indexed as

CompetencyEvidence-based practiceMechanical ventilationNursingTraining

Identifiers

PMID38566049
PMCPMC10986015
OpenAlexW4393508895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.