Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38566044›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2024

Sex differences in pain catastrophizing and its relation to the transition from acute pain to chronic pain.

Linh H L Le, Vanessa A V Brown, Sander Mol, Kaoutar Azijli, Martijn M Kuijper, Leonie Becker, Seppe S H A Koopman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sex differences in the transition to chronic pain.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linh H L LeErasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vanessa A V BrownDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander MolDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Kaoutar AzijliDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn M KuijperMaasstad Academy, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leonie BeckerDepartment of Cardiology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Seppe S H A KoopmanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21 3079 DZ Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. koopmanj@maasstadziekenhuis.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and importanceDifferences exist between sexes in pain and pain-related outcomes, such as development of chronic pain. Previous studies suggested a higher risk for pain chronification in female patients. Furthermore, pain catastrophizing is an important risk factor for chronification of pain. However, it is unclear whether sex differences in catastrophic thinking could explain the sex differences in pain chronification.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to examine sex differences in pain catastrophizing. Additionally, we investigated pain catastrophizing as a potential mediator of sex differences in the transition of acute to chronic pain. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND

participantsAdults visiting one of the 15 participating emergency departments in the Netherlands with acute pain-related complaints. Subjects had to meet inclusion criteria and complete questionnaires about their health and pain. OUTCOMES MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The outcomes in this prospective cohort study were pain catastrophizing (short form pain catastrophizing) and pain chronification at 90 days (Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 1). Data was analysed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Finally, stratified regression analyses were conducted to assess whether differences in pain catastrophizing accounted for observed differences in pain chronification between sexes. MAIN

resultsIn total 1,906 patients were included. Females catastrophized pain significantly more than males (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses suggested that pain catastrophizing is associated with pain chronification in both sexes.

conclusionsThis study reported differences between sexes in catastrophic cognitions in the development of chronic pain. This is possibly of clinical importance to identify high-risk patients and ensure an early intervention to prevent the transition from acute to chronic pain.

Indexed as

Acute PainChronic PainAdultCatastrophizationFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSex CharacteristicsSurveys and QuestionnairesDifferences between sexesPain catastrophizingPain chronification

Identifiers

PMID38566044
PMCPMC10985981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.