Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565981›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Classification system for primary care provider eConsults about medications for older adults with frailty.

T Schneider, B Farrell, S Karunananthan, A Afkham, E Keely, C Liddy, L M McCarthy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T SchneiderLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
B FarrellBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
S KarunananthanBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
A AfkhamOntario Health East, Ottawa, Canada.
E KeelyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
C LiddyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
L M McCarthyLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. lisa.mccarthy@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9087-1077
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR PNN-177926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding primary care for people with frailty can be challenging due to an increased risk of adverse outcomes and use of potentially inappropriate medications which may exacerbate characteristics of frailty. eConsult is a service where primary care providers can receive timely specialist advice for their patients through a secure web-based application. We aimed to develop a classification system to characterize medication-focused eConsult questions for older adults with frailty and assess its usability.

methodsA classification system was developed and refined over three cycles of improvement through a cross-sectional study of 35 cases categorized as medication-focused from cases submitted in 2019 for patients aged 65 or older with frailty through the Champlain BASE eConsult service (Ontario, Canada). The final classification system was then applied to each case.

resultsThe classification system contains 5 sections: (1) case descriptives; (2) intent and type of question; (3) medication recommendations and additional information in the response; (4) medication classification; and (5) potentially inappropriate medications. Among the 35 medication-focused cases, the most common specialties consulted were endocrinology (9 cases, 26%) and cardiology (5 cases, 14%). Medication histories were available for 29 cases (83%). Many patients were prescribed potentially inappropriate medications based on explicit tools (AGS Beers Criteria®, STOPPFall, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale, ThinkCascades) yet few consults inquired about these medications.

conclusionA classification system to describe medication-related eConsult cases for patients experiencing frailty was developed and applied to 35 eConsult cases. It can be applied to more cases to identify professional development opportunities and enhancements for eConsult services.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOntarioPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationClassificationFrailtyPharmaceutical preparationsPotentially inappropriate medication listPrimary health careRemote consultation

Identifiers

PMID38565981
PMCPMC10985926
OpenAlexW4393396951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.