ArticleScientific reports2024
Screening of cellulose-degrading bacteria and optimization of cellulase production from Bacillus cereus A49 through response surface methodology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening and ARTP mutagenesis-based breeding of high-cellulase-producing strains.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- Gut microbiome composition and cellulolytic bacteria associated with the carpenter bee Xylocopa frontalis.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Nutrient utilization and degradative enzyme activity of the dragon fruit canker pathogen,Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- Bio decomposition of paddy straw waste using laccase producing novel soil bacterial isolates: An eco-friendly and sustainable approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Production of volatile fatty acids through microbial conversion of waste sludges: influence of substrates.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Enhanced Low-Temperature Lignocellulose Degradation by an ARTP-InducedMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Advancing cellulose degradation through synthetic biology: engineered pathways and microbial systems for sustainable biomass conversion.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Rice Straw Haylage, Ruminal Fermentation Parameters and Methane Production in Hu Sheep.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Taxonomic and Metagenomic Survey of a Peat-Based Straw Degrading Biofertilizer.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Isolation and identification of a novel cellulolytic bacterium and optimization of FPase production for bagasse hydrolysis.Biodegradation · 2025Article
- Pathogen Identification, Antagonistic Microbe Screening, and Biocontrol Strategies forMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Response surface optimization for cellulase production from Enterococcus faecium and Stutzerimonas stutzeri isolated from Gossypium arboretum and Solanum melongena soil.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Isolation, Screening, Identification of Cellulolytic Bacteria and Optimization of Factors Affecting FPUase Synthesis for Bagasse Hydrolysis.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Optimized production and characterization of a thermostable cellulase from Streptomyces thermodiastaticus strain.AMB Express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cellulose-degrading microorganisms hold immense significance in utilizing cellulose resources efficiently. The screening of natural cellulase bacteria and the optimization of fermentation conditions are the hot spots of research. This study meticulously screened cellulose-degrading bacteria from mixed soil samples adopting a multi-step approach, encompassing preliminary culture medium screening, Congo red medium-based re-screening, and quantification of cellulase activity across various strains. Particularly, three robust cellulase-producing strains were identified: A24 (MT740356.1 Brevibacillus borstelensis), A49 (MT740358.1 Bacillus cereus), and A61 (MT740357.1 Paenibacillus sp.). For subsequent cultivation experiments, the growth curves of the three obtained isolates were monitored diligently. Additionally, optimal CMCase production conditions were determined, keeping CMCase activity as a key metric, through a series of single-factor experiments: agitation speed, cultivation temperature, unit medium concentration, and inoculum volume. Maximum CMCase production was observed at 150 rpm/37 °C, doubling the unit medium addition, and a 5 mL inoculation volume. Further optimization was conducted using the selected isolate A49 employing response surface methodology. The software model recommended a 2.21fold unit medium addition, 36.11 °C temperature, and 4.91 mL inoculant volume for optimal CMCase production. Consequently, three parallel experiments were conducted based on predicted conditions consistently yielding an average CMCase production activity of 15.63 U/mL, closely aligning with the predicted value of 16.41 U/mL. These findings validated the reliability of the model and demonstrated the effectiveness of optimized CMCase production conditions for isolate A49.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.