Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565833›Full record

ArticleHepatology international2024

Liver fibrosis showed a two-phase regression rate during long-term anti-HBV therapy by three-time biopsies assessments.

Shuyan Chen, Jialing Zhou, Xiaoning Wu, Tongtong Meng, Bingqiong Wang, Hui Liu, Tailing Wang, Xinyan Zhao, Xinyu Zhao, Yuanyuan Kong and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: prioritizing dynamic monitoring and expanding population screening].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shuyan ChenLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jialing ZhouLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xiaoning WuLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Tongtong MengLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Bingqiong WangLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tailing WangDepartment of Pathology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinyan ZhaoLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Xinyu ZhaoClinical Epidemiology and EBM Unit, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Yuanyuan KongClinical Epidemiology and EBM Unit, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiaojuan OuLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Jidong JiaLiver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yameng Sun *Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China. sunyamenggo@163.com.
Hong You *Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Liver Cirrhosis, National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing, China. youhong30@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9409-1158

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Z221100007422115National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2017ZX10203202-003National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2018ZX10302204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence has proven that liver fibrosis or even cirrhosis can be reversed by anti-HBV treatment. However, the difference of fibrosis regression rates in short-term and long-term antiviral therapy remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to identify the dynamic changes in fibrosis regression rate in patients with three-time liver biopsies during 5 years antiviral therapy.

methodsCHB patients with three times of liver biopsies (baseline, after 1.5-year and 5-year antiviral therapy) from a prospective cohort were enrolled. All patients were biopsy-proved Ishak stage ≥ 3 at baseline (n = 92). Fibrosis regression was defined as Ishak stage decreased ≥ 1 or predominantly regressive categorized by P-I-R score.

resultsTotals of 65.2% (60/92) and 80.4% (74/92) patients attained fibrosis regression after 1.5-year and 5-year therapy, respectively. Median HBV DNA level declined from 6.5 log IU/ml (baseline) to 0 log IU/ml (1.5 years and 5 years, P < 0.001). The mean level of Ishak fibrosis stage in all patients decreased from stage 4.1 (baseline) to 3.7 (1.5 years) then 3.2 (5 years). Fibrosis regression rates were 0.27 stage/year between baseline to year 1.5 and 0.14 stage/year between year 1.5 and year 5. Furthermore, for patients who attained fibrosis regression after 5-year antiviral therapy, the two-phase regression rates were 0.39 stage/year (0 year-1.5 years) and 0.20 stage/year (1.5 years-5 years). This two-phase feature of regression rate was further confirmed by fully-quantification assessment of liver fibrosis based on SHG/TPEF.

conclusionDuring the 5 years of long-term antiviral treatment, liver fibrosis rapidly regresses in the first 1.5 years before slowing down in the following 3.5 years.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsHepatitis B, ChronicLiver CirrhosisAdultBiopsyDNA, ViralFemaleHepatitis B virusHumansLiverMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsDNA, ViralAntiviral treatmentChronic hepatitis BCirrhosisHepatic fibrosisIshak fibrosis scoreIshak-HAI scoreP-I-R scoreReverseSerial liver biopsiesSHG/TPEF

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.