Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565787›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Proposal of set-up standardization for general surgery procedures with the CMR Versius system, a new robotic platform: our initial experience.

Andrea Pisani Ceretti, Nicolò Maria Mariani, Marta Perego, Marco Giovenzana, Adelona Salaj, Giampaolo Formisano, Federico Gheza, Gaia Gloria, Rocco Bernardo, Paolo Pietro Bianchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. 2025 Delphi consensus on robotic ventral mesh rectopexy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea Pisani CerettiDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. andreapisaniceretti@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2107-6322
Nicolò Maria MarianiDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. nicolo.mariani@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4360-187X
Marta PeregoDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marco GiovenzanaDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-3629
Adelona SalajDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giampaolo FormisanoDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-7400
Federico GhezaDivision of General Surgery, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia and Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-7840
Gaia GloriaDivision of Gynecology, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Rocco BernardoDivision of Urology, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Paolo Pietro BianchiDivision of General and Robotic Surgery, Department of Health Sciences, ASST Santi Paolo E Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2690-3502
University of Milan · ITAOL (United States) · USUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe article describes our initial experience using CMR Versius platform for several procedures in general surgery.

methodsBetween September 2022 and April 2023, seventy patients underwent robotic surgery in a multi-robotic referral center (San Paolo University Hospital, Milan, Italy). Three surgeons with only laparoscopic experience performed 24 cholecystectomies, 13 inguinal hernia repairs, 9 ventral hernia repairs, 7 right hemicolectomies, 11 left hemicolectomies, 1 sigmoidectomy, 1 ileocecal resection, 1 ventral rectopexy, 1 Nissen fundoplication, 1 total splenectomy, and 1 exploration with multiple biopsies.

resultsAll surgeries were full-robotic, with only one conversion to laparoscopy. The short length of stay and low rate of severe morbidity are promising findings. Although operative time was lengthened, clinical outcomes were not affected.

conclusionsOur experience demonstrates that the adoption of Versius system is safe and feasible in general surgery. The standardization of port placement and BSU set-up can certainly reduce the operative time.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresColectomyHumansMinimally invasive surgeryNew frontiers in surgeryRobotic surgical systemVersius

Identifiers

PMID38565787
OpenAlexW4393581310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.