Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565601›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2024

Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by glaucoma: A meta-analysis from 2000 to 2020.

Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study, GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
43.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 20 institutions in 47 countries.

Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study
GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators
University of Washington · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INUniversity of Ibadan · NGHarvard University · USIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRJohns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine · VNQueen's University Belfast · GBShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRThe University of Sydney · AUVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAmity University · INAnglia Ruskin University · GBBeijing Tongren Hospital · CNCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentral University of Punjab · INDeakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Crete · GR

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) N/ABrien Holden Vision Institute N/ASightsavers International N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate global and regional trends from 2000 to 2020 of the number of persons visually impaired by glaucoma and their proportion of the total number of vision-impaired individuals.

methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of published population studies and grey literature from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to estimate global and regional trends in number of people with vision loss due to glaucoma. Moderate or severe vision loss (MSVI) was defined as visual acuity of 6/60 or better but <6/18 (moderate) and visual acuity of 3/60 or better but <6/60 (severe vision loss). Blindness was defined as presenting visual acuity <3/60.

resultsGlobally, in 2020, 3.61 million people were blind and nearly 4.14 million were visually impaired by glaucoma. Glaucoma accounted for 8.39% (95% uncertainty intervals [UIs]: 6.54, 10.29) of all blindness and 1.41% (95% UI: 1.10, 1.75) of all MSVI. Regionally, the highest proportion of blindness relating to glaucoma was found in high-income countries (26.12% [95% UI: 20.72, 32.09]), while the region with the highest age-standardized prevalence of glaucoma-related blindness and MSVI was Sub-Saharan Africa. Between 2000 and 2020, global age-standardized prevalence of glaucoma-related blindness among adults ≥50 years decreased by 26.06% among males (95% UI: 25.87, 26.24), and by 21.75% among females (95% UI: 21.54, 21.96), while MSVI due to glaucoma increased by 3.7% among males (95% UI: 3.42, 3.98), and by 7.3% in females (95% UI: 7.01, 7.59).

conclusionsWithin the last two decades, glaucoma has remained a major cause of blindness globally and regionally.

Indexed as

BlindnessGlaucomaGlobal HealthPersons with Visual DisabilitiesHumansPrevalenceVision, LowVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID38565601
PMCPMC11269708
OpenAlexW4393411039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.