Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565319›Full record

ReviewIntegrative and comparative biology2024

Problems with Paralogs: The Promise and Challenges of Gene Duplicates in Evo-Devo Research.

Kevin D Deem, Jennifer A Brisson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative and comparative biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The subfunctionalization ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin D DeemDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14620.ORCID 0000-0002-1539-823X
Jennifer A BrissonDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, 14620.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms and Evolution of Phenotypic PlasticityR35GM144001 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI JENNIFER A BRISSON · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM144001NIH HHS R35GM144001NSF DBI-2305817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplicates, or paralogs, serve as a major source of new genetic material and comprise seeds for evolutionary innovation. While originally thought to be quickly lost or nonfunctionalized following duplication, now a vast number of paralogs are known to be retained in a functional state. Daughter paralogs can provide robustness through redundancy, specialize via sub-functionalization, or neo-functionalize to play new roles. Indeed, the duplication and divergence of developmental genes have played a monumental role in the evolution of animal forms (e.g., Hox genes). Still, despite their prevalence and evolutionary importance, the precise detection of gene duplicates in newly sequenced genomes remains technically challenging and often overlooked. This presents an especially pertinent problem for evolutionary developmental biology, where hypothesis testing requires accurate detection of changes in gene expression and function, often in nontraditional model species. Frequently, these analyses rely on molecular reagents designed within coding sequences that may be highly similar in recently duplicated paralogs, leading to cross-reactivity and spurious results. Thus, care is needed to avoid erroneously assigning diverged functions of paralogs to a single gene, and potentially misinterpreting evolutionary history. This perspective aims to overview the prevalence and importance of paralogs and to shed light on the difficulty of their detection and analysis while offering potential solutions.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAnimalsDevelopmental BiologyGenes, Duplicate

Identifiers

PMID38565319
PMCPMC11406157
OpenAlexW4393417706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.