Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565188›Full record

ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2024

The new era of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology: current research and promising tools.

Fabíola Bezerra de Carvalho Macruz, Ana Luiza Mandetta Pettengil Dias, Celi Santos Andrade, Mariana Penteado Nucci, Carolina de Medeiros Rimkus, Leandro Tavares Lucato, Antônio José da Rocha, Felipe Campos Kitamura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabíola Bezerra de Carvalho MacruzUniversidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Seção de Neurorradiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-7631
Ana Luiza Mandetta Pettengil DiasDiagnósticos da América SA, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6716-8340
Celi Santos AndradeCentro de Diagnósticos Brasil, Alliança Group, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0382-3232
Mariana Penteado NucciUniversidade de São Paulo, Laboratório de Investigação Médica em Ressonância Magnética (LIM 44), São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1502-9215
Carolina de Medeiros RimkusUniversidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Seção de Neurorradiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3866-1299
Leandro Tavares LucatoUniversidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia e Oncologia, Seção de Neurorradiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9181-5245
Antônio José da RochaDiagnósticos da América SA, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2591-9171
Felipe Campos KitamuraDiagnósticos da América SA, São Paulo SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9992-5630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiology has a number of characteristics that make it an especially suitable medical discipline for early artificial intelligence (AI) adoption. These include having a well-established digital workflow, standardized protocols for image storage, and numerous well-defined interpretive activities. The more than 200 commercial radiologic AI-based products recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to assist radiologists in a number of narrow image-analysis tasks such as image enhancement, workflow triage, and quantification, corroborate this observation. However, in order to leverage AI to boost efficacy and efficiency, and to overcome substantial obstacles to widespread successful clinical use of these products, radiologists should become familiarized with the emerging applications in their particular areas of expertise. In light of this, in this article we survey the existing literature on the application of AI-based techniques in neuroradiology, focusing on conditions such as vascular diseases, epilepsy, and demyelinating and neurodegenerative conditions. We also introduce some of the algorithms behind the applications, briefly discuss a few of the challenges of generalization in the use of AI models in neuroradiology, and skate over the most relevant commercially available solutions adopted in clinical practice. If well designed, AI algorithms have the potential to radically improve radiology, strengthening image analysis, enhancing the value of quantitative imaging techniques, and mitigating diagnostic errors.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologyAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID38565188
PMCPMC10987255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.