Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565152›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Body mass mediates spatio-temporal responses of mammals to human frequentation across Italian protected areas.

Marco Salvatori, Ilaria Greco, Luca Petroni, Alessandro Massolo, Enrico Dorigatti, Martina Miscioscia, Luca Natucci, Valentina Oberosler, Piergiovanni Partel, Paolo Pedrini and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Placement matters: Implications of trail- versus random-based camera-trap deployment for monitoring mammal communities.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marco SalvatoriDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5491-4797
Ilaria GrecoDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6208-2465
Luca PetroniEthology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-8725-7014
Alessandro MassoloEthology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6333-4281
Enrico DorigattiParco Naturale Paneveggio Pale di San Martino, località Castelpietra, 2, 38054 Primiero San Martino di Castrozza (TN), Italy.
Martina MisciosciaDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.
Luca NatucciEthology Unit, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Volta 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Valentina OberoslerMUSE-Museo delle Scienze, Corso del lavoro e della scienza 3, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Piergiovanni PartelParco Naturale Paneveggio Pale di San Martino, località Castelpietra, 2, 38054 Primiero San Martino di Castrozza (TN), Italy.
Paolo PedriniMUSE-Museo delle Scienze, Corso del lavoro e della scienza 3, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Gilberto VolcanParco Naturale Paneveggio Pale di San Martino, località Castelpietra, 2, 38054 Primiero San Martino di Castrozza (TN), Italy.
Francesco RoveroDepartment of Biology, University of Florence, via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6688-1494

Funding

European Union-NextGenerationEU's National Biodiversity Future CentreParco Nazionale Foreste Casentinesi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protected area (PA) networks are a pivotal tool to fight biodiversity loss, yet they often need to balance the mission of nature conservation with the socio-economic need of giving opportunity for outdoor recreation. Recreation in natural areas is important for human health in an urbanized society, but can prompt behavioural modifications in wild animals. Rarely, however, have these responses being studied across multiple PAs and using standardized methods. We deployed a systematic camera trapping protocol at over 200 sites to sample medium and large mammals in four PAs within the European Natura 2000 network to assess their spatio-temporal responses to human frequentation, proximity to towns, amount of open habitat and topographical variables. By applying multi-species and single-species models for the number of diurnal, crepuscular and nocturnal detections and a multi-species model for nocturnality index, we estimated both species-specific- and meta-community-level effects, finding that increased nocturnality appeared the main strategy that the mammal meta-community used to cope with human disturbance. However, responses in the diurnal, crepuscular and nocturnal site use were mediated by species' body mass, with larger species exhibiting avoidance of humans and smaller species more opportunistic behaviours. Our results show the effectiveness of standardized sampling and provide insights for planning the expansion of PA networks as foreseen by the Kunming-Montreal biodiversity agreement.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesMammalsAnimalsAnimals, WildBiodiversityEcosystemHumansItalyhuman disturbancehuman–wildlife coexistencenocturnalityoutdoor recreationprotected areas

Identifiers

PMID38565152
PMCPMC10987237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.