Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38565089›Full record

Trial reportOncology research and treatment2024

Adjuvant Treatment with S-1 in Patients after R0-Resection of Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach and Esophagogastric Junction: A Multicenter Phase I/II Feasibility Study (GMBH-STO-0114).

Kathrin Heinrich, Volker Heinemann, Sebastian Stintzing, Lothar Müller, Thomas J Ettrich, Petra Büchner-Steudel, Michael Geißler, Jörg Trojan, Nicolas Moosmann, Gunnar Folprecht and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncology research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Kathrin HeinrichDepartment of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Volker HeinemannDepartment of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian StintzingDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Lothar MüllerOncology Practice UnterEms, Leer, Germany.
Thomas J EttrichDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Petra Büchner-SteudelMartin-Luther-University Halle Wittenberg, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Michael GeißlerHospital Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Jörg TrojanMedical Clinic 1, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Nicolas MoosmannDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany.
Gunnar FolprechtDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Faculty of Medicine and Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Johannes SchmidtDepartment of Surgery, LAKUMED, Teaching Hospital Technical University Munich (TUM), Landshut, Germany.
Stephan KanzlerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Schweinfurt, Germany.
Frank KullmannDepartment of Medicine I, Klinikum Weiden, Weiden, Germany.
Jean-Charles MoulinOrtenau Klinikum Lahr, Medizinische Klinik, Sektion Hämatologie/Onkologie, Lahr, Germany.
Jens WernerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin K AngeleDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
Victoria ProbstDepartment of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Swantje HeldClinAssess GmbH, Department of Biometry, Leverkusen, Germany.
Christoph SchulzDepartment of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Myrto BoukovalaDepartment of Medicine III and Comprehensive Cancer Center, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEKlinikum Weiden · DEKrankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder · DELeopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEOrtenau Klinikum · DEUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionS-1 has been shown to be an effective adjuvant treatment option for East Asian patients who underwent gastrectomy for stage II/III gastric cancer. We conducted a phase I/II study to evaluate the feasibility, tolerability, and efficacy of administering S-1 in the adjuvant setting after R0-resection of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) in Caucasian patients.

methodsIn this single-cohort, open-label, phase I/II trial, we enrolled patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or EGJ having undergone R0-resection with or without neoadjuvant treatment. One treatment cycle consisted of oral S-1 (30 mg/m2 bid) for 14 days. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for 18 cycles (54 weeks). Primary endpoint was feasibility and tolerability. Safety was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Secondary endpoints were 1-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate, RFS, and overall survival (OS).

resultsBetween October 2015 and February 2018, 32 patients were enrolled in 12 German centers, and 30 started adjuvant study treatment. Seventeen patients completed all 18 cycles. Two patients terminated study treatment early due to adverse events (AEs), 7 due to patient's or investigator's decision, and 4 due to recurrence or distant metastasis during adjuvant therapy. Dose levels were reduced to 25 mg/m2 in 9 patients and to 20 mg/m2 in 1 patient. Of patients completing all 18 cycles, 5 did so with reduced dosage of S-1. Documented grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia, diarrhea, vomiting, polyneuropathy, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia, and rash. Serious AEs were observed in 7 patients. Median RFS was 32.2 months. One-year RFS rate was 77%. Data on OS were still premature at the end of the study.

conclusionAdjuvant treatment with S-1 for 1 year is a feasible and safe treatment option for Caucasian patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma or cancer of the EGJ after R0-resection.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaDrug CombinationsEsophagogastric JunctionFeasibility StudiesGastrectomyOxonic AcidStomach NeoplasmsTegafurAdultAgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticChemotherapy, AdjuvantEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug CombinationsOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)TegafurAdjuvant treatmentEsophagogastric junction cancerGastric cancerGastrointestinal cancerS-1

Identifiers

PMID38565089
PMCPMC11151986
OpenAlexW4393576299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.