Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38564629›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Essential elements of physical fitness analysis in male adolescent athletes using machine learning.

Yun-Hwan Lee, Jisuk Chang, Ji-Eun Lee, Yeon-Sung Jung, Dongheon Lee, Ho-Seong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yun-Hwan LeeDepartment of Exercise and Medical Science, Graduate School, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Jisuk ChangDepartment of Sports Management, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Eun LeeDepartment of Exercise and Medical Science, Graduate School, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8228-3053
Yeon-Sung JungThe Sport Science Center in Gyeonggi, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dongheon LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3121-7099
Ho-Seong LeeDepartment of Exercise and Medical Science, Graduate School, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5779-1080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical fitness (PF) includes various factors that significantly impacts athletic performance. Analyzing PF is critical in developing customized training methods for athletes based on the sports in which they compete. Previous approaches to analyzing PF have relied on statistical or machine learning algorithms that focus on predicting athlete injury or performance. In this study, six machine learning algorithms were used to analyze the PF of 1,489 male adolescent athletes across five sports, including track & field, football, baseball, swimming, and badminton. Furthermore, the machine learning models were utilized to analyze the essential elements of PF using feature importance of XGBoost, and SHAP values. As a result, XGBoost represents the highest performance, with an average accuracy of 90.14, an area under the curve of 0.86, and F1-score of 0.87, demonstrating the similarity between the sports. Feature importance of XGBoost, and SHAP value provided a quantitative assessment of the relative importance of PF in sports by comparing two sports within each of the five sports. This analysis is expected to be useful in analyzing the essential PF elements of athletes in various sports and recommending personalized exercise methods accordingly.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesFootballAdolescentAthletesHumansMalePhysical FitnessSwimming

Identifiers

PMID38564629
PMCPMC10986970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.