Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38564369›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Natural variation in the

Laure Mignerot, Clotilde Gimond, Lucie Bolelli, Charlotte Bouleau, Asma Sandjak, Thomas Boulin, Christian Braendle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Epigenetic constraints and enhancer innovation link neuronal plasticity to evolutionary adaptation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Egg laying during stress-induced sleep ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laure Mignerot *Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IBV, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3306-6244
Clotilde Gimond *Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IBV, Nice, France.
Lucie BolelliUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IBV, Nice, France.
Charlotte BouleauUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IBV, Nice, France.
Asma SandjakUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IBV, Nice, France.
Thomas BoulinInstitut NeuroMyoGène, CNRS, Inserm, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1734-1915
Christian BraendleUniversité Côte d'Azur, CNRS, Inserm, IBV, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0203-4581
Inserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-01Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-CE02-0017Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE13-0030-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary transitions from egg laying (oviparity) to live birth (viviparity) are common across various taxa. Many species also exhibit genetic variation in egg-laying mode or display an intermediate mode with laid eggs containing embryos at various stages of development. Understanding the mechanistic basis and fitness consequences of such variation remains experimentally challenging. Here, we report highly variable intra-uterine egg retention across 316

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAnimalsBiological EvolutionOviparityOvipositionCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsC. elegansegg-laying behaviouregg retentionevolutionary biologyneural circuitneuroscienceoviparityreproductive strategyviviparity

Identifiers

PMID38564369
PMCPMC10987095
OpenAlexW4382397879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.