ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Code-Free Machine Learning Approach for EVO-ICL Vault Prediction: A Retrospective Two-Center Study.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- EVO-ICL Vault Prediction: A Data Wrangling Framework Integrating Multicenter Big Data and Machine Learning.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Exploring Machine Learning Models for Vault Safety in ICL Implantation: A Comparative Analysis of Regression and Classification Models.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- Retinal vein occlusion risk prediction without fundus examination using a no-code machine learning tool for tabular data: a nationwide cross-sectional study from South Korea.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Application of multimodal large language models for safety indicator calculation and contraindication prediction in laser vision correction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Automated and code-free development of a risk calculator using ChatGPT-4 for predicting diabetic retinopathy and macular edema without retinal imaging.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Prediction of postoperative vault after implantable collamer lens implantation with deep learning.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Codeless Development of a Customized SMILE Nomogram Using a Large Language Model: A Practical Framework for Clinicians.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Development of a novel scoring system for glaucoma risk based on demographic and laboratory factors using ChatGPT-4.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of an AI-Based Tool for Postoperative Vault Estimation in Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Application of ChatGPT-4 to oculomics: a cost-effective osteoporosis risk assessment to enhance management as a proof-of-principles model in 3PM.The EPMA journal · 2024Article
- Paired-eye comparison of endothelial cell density and vault height after implantable collamer lens implantation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Establishing a development environment for machine learning is difficult for medical researchers because learning to code is a major barrier. This study aimed to improve the accuracy of a postoperative vault value prediction model for implantable collamer lens (ICL) sizing using machine learning without coding experience. Methods: We used Orange data mining, a recently developed open-source, code-free machine learning tool. This study included eye-pair data from 294 patients from the B&VIIT Eye Center and 26 patients from Kim's Eye Hospital. The model was developed using OCULUS Pentacam data from the B&VIIT Eye Center and was internally evaluated through 10-fold cross-validation. External validation was performed using data from Kim's Eye Hospital. Results: The machine learning model was successfully trained using the data collected without coding. The random forest showed mean absolute errors of 124.8 µm and 152.4 µm for the internal 10-fold cross-validation and the external validation, respectively. For high vault prediction (>750 µm), the random forest showed areas under the curve of 0.725 and 0.760 for the internal and external validation datasets, respectively. The developed model performed better than the classic statistical regression models and the Google no-code platform. Conclusions: Applying a no-code machine learning tool to our ICL implantation datasets showed a more accurate prediction of the postoperative vault than the classic regression and Google no-code models. Translational Relevance: Because of significant bias in measurements and surgery between clinics, the no-code development of a customized machine learning nomogram will improve the accuracy of ICL implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.