ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Democratizing Vitreoretinal Surgery Training With a Portable and Affordable Virtual Reality Simulator in the Metaverse.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Virtual Reality in Ophthalmic Surgical Education: Current Innovations and Future Perspectives.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Advances in the application of virtual reality technology in ophthalmic surgical skills training.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Can bionic eyes restore vision? Breakthroughs, challenges, and future frontiers in ophthalmology - A comprehensive review.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Article
- An overview of Metaverse in healthcare. Potential application in forensic and legal medicine.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2025Review
- Global trends and practice patterns in virtual reality simulation training for ophthalmic surgery: an international survey use of virtual reality simulation training around the world.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The impact of intraoperative optical coherence tomography on cognitive load in virtual reality vitreoretinal surgery training.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Utility of Virtual Reality in Ophthalmology: A Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Generative artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: current innovations, future applications and challenges.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Navigating the Metaverse: A New Virtual Tool with Promising Real Benefits for Breast Cancer Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- The Metaverse in Ophthalmology: Application and Perceived Benefits, Challenges, Realistic Expectations, and Future Outlook.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate RetinaVR, an affordable, portable, and fully immersive virtual reality (VR) simulator for vitreoretinal surgery training. Methods: We built RetinaVR as a standalone app on the Meta Quest 2 VR headset. It simulates core vitrectomy, peripheral shaving, membrane peeling, and endolaser application. In a validation study (n = 20 novices and experts), we measured: efficiency, safety, and module-specific performance. We first explored unadjusted performance differences through an effect size analysis. Then, a linear mixed-effects model was used to isolate the impact of age, sex, expertise, and experimental run on performance. Results: Experts were significantly safer in membrane peeling but not when controlling for other factors. Experts were significantly better in core vitrectomy, even when controlling for other factors (P = 0.014). Heatmap analysis of endolaser applications showed more consistent retinopexy among experts. Age had no impact on performance, but male subjects were faster in peripheral shaving (P = 0.036) and membrane peeling (P = 0.004). A learning curve was demonstrated with improving efficiency at each experimental run for all modules. Repetition also led to improved safety during membrane peeling (P = 0.003), and better task-specific performance during core vitrectomy (P = 0.038), peripheral shaving (P = 0.011), and endolaser application (P = 0.043). User experience was favorable to excellent in all spheres. Conclusions: RetinaVR demonstrates potential as an affordable, portable training tool for vitreoretinal surgery. Its construct validity is established, showing varying performance in a way that correlates with experimental runs, age, sex, and level of expertise. Translational Relevance: Fully immersive VR technology could revolutionize surgical training, making it more accessible, especially in developing nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.